Law on the Protection of Personal Data of Bosnia and Herzegovina, cross-border transfer
Law on the Protection of Personal Data, arts. 46-51, 91-95 (cross-border transfer)
A citation is an address, not a summary. The first part names the law; what follows narrows it to the exact section, article or paragraph.
What follows is LexLint's own research summary of this law, not legal advice.
In force 12 months, effective 4 October 2025.
A cross border transfer rule binding public and private bodies.
As of 19 September 2026.
What it requires
- Rely on a Council of Ministers adequacy decision, or an appropriate safeguard such as standard contractual clauses, binding business rules, or an approved code of conduct or certification, before transferring personal data outside Bosnia and Herzegovina, under Articles 46 to 49.
- Absent an adequacy decision or an appropriate safeguard, transfer personal data outside Bosnia and Herzegovina only on a narrow derogation such as the person's informed explicit consent, contractual necessity, or an essential public interest, and never repetitively or systematically, under Article 51.
- Do not recognize or carry out a foreign court judgment or administrative decision that would require you to transfer or disclose personal data, unless it rests on an international agreement such as a mutual-legal-assistance treaty between that country and Bosnia and Herzegovina, under Article 50.
- As a competent authority transferring personal data to another country or international organisation for a criminal-law purpose, apply the same adequacy-or-safeguards test and document your assessment, under Articles 91 to 95.
What it reaches
Obligation class
Transfer, Access restriction
What this law does
Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page.
Article 46 lets a transfer to another country or international organisation take place only in compliance with this chapter, including an onward transfer. Article 47 lets a transfer proceed without further safeguards where the Council of Ministers, on the Agency's proposal, has decided that the destination ensures an adequate level of protection, a decision the Agency continuously reviews and reports on.
Absent an adequacy decision, Article 48 lets a transfer proceed on appropriate safeguards such as a legally binding instrument between public authorities, binding business rules under Article 49, an approved code of conduct or certification mechanism, or standard contractual clauses the Agency adopts, some subject to the Agency's prior approval.
Article 50 bars recognizing or carrying out a foreign court judgment or administrative decision that would require a transfer or disclosure of personal data unless it rests on an international agreement such as a mutual-legal-assistance treaty between the requesting country and Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Article 51 permits a transfer absent an adequacy decision or appropriate safeguards only on a listed derogation, such as the person's informed explicit consent, contractual necessity, an essential public interest, or a legal claim, and bars relying on the narrower residual derogation in Article 51(2) for a transfer that is repetitive or systematic.
Articles 91 to 95 restate the same adequacy, safeguards and derogation structure for a competent authority transferring personal data for the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of a criminal offence, adding that the transferring authority must weigh the seriousness of the offence and the destination's level of protection before authorizing an onward transfer, and that a transfer of data originally received from another country needs that country's prior authorisation except where an immediate and serious threat to public security makes obtaining it impossible in time.
When LexLint raises it
crawls_webtrains_modelsdeploys_chatbotprocesses_biometrics
Read the law
Official English-language statute PDF hosted by the Agency for Statistics of Bosnia and Herzegovina (bhas.gov.ba)
read in full (207,438 characters, untruncated)
Every line above is drawn from the primary source linked here, read on the date shown. This is a research summary, not legal advice.