LGPD, sensitive personal data and children's data
Lei nº 13.709, de 2018 (LGPD), arts. 5º, II, 11-14 (sensitive personal data and children's data)
A citation is an address, not a summary. The first part names the law; what follows narrows it to the exact section, article or paragraph.
What follows is LexLint's own research summary of this law, not legal advice.
In force since 18 September 2020.
A sensitive categories rule binding public and private bodies.
As of 19 September 2026.
What it requires
- Obtain specific, highlighted consent, or another article 11 legal basis, before processing sensitive personal data such as health, genetic, or biometric data.
- Process a child's or adolescent's personal data only with specific, highlighted consent from at least one parent or legal guardian, except to contact the parent once without storing the data or to protect the child, and never condition participation in a game, application, or other activity on more personal data than the activity strictly needs.
- Do not treat anonymized data as personal data unless the anonymization process can be reversed using your own means or with reasonable effort, and treat data used to build an identifiable behavioral profile as personal data again.
- Give a public-health research body access to personal data only within a controlled and secure environment, anonymized or pseudonymized where possible, and never transfer that data to a third party.
- Do not share sensitive health data between controllers for economic advantage, except for the data subject's requested portability or the listed health-service, pharmaceutical, or health-assistance transactions.
What it reaches
Obligation class
Prohibition, Consent, Biometric, Age verification
What this law does
Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page.
Article 5, II defines sensitive personal data as data about racial or ethnic origin, religious conviction, political opinion, union or religious, philosophical or political association, health or sex life, or genetic or biometric data tied to a natural person, and article 11 confines its processing to specific, highlighted consent or a narrow list of alternative bases: a legal or regulatory obligation, a public-policy purpose, research with anonymization where possible, the exercise of a right, protecting life or physical safety, health treatment, or fraud prevention and authentication safeguards.
Article 11, paragraph 4 bars sharing sensitive health data between controllers for economic advantage, except for data-subject-requested portability or the health-service, pharmaceutical and health-assistance transactions the provision lists, and bars a health-insurance operator outright from using health data to select risks in contracting or excluding beneficiaries.
Article 12 excludes anonymized data from the definition of personal data unless the anonymization can be reversed with the controller's own means or reasonable effort, and treats data used to build an identifiable behavioral profile as personal data again. Article 13 lets a research body access personal data for public-health studies only within a controlled and secure environment, anonymized or pseudonymized where possible, and bars any transfer of that data to a third party.
Article 14 requires a child's or adolescent's data to be processed in their best interest, with specific, highlighted consent from at least one parent or legal guardian, except to contact the parent once without storing the data or to protect the child, bars conditioning participation in a game, application or activity on more personal data than the activity strictly needs, and requires the controller to make reasonable efforts, considering available technology, to verify that the consent came from the responsible adult.
When LexLint raises it
crawls_webtrains_modelsprocesses_biometricsserves_minorshandles_health_records
Read the law
Official compiled text of Lei nº 13.709/2018, Presidência da República
Every line above is drawn from the primary source linked here, read on the date shown. This is a research summary, not legal advice.