ChinaInterim Measures for the Management of Generative AI Services, Article 14
Interim Measures for the Management of Generative AI Services (生成式人工智能服务管理暂行办法), 2023, Art. 14
A citation is an address, not a summary. The first part names the law; what follows narrows it to the exact section, article or paragraph.
What follows is LexLint's own research summary of this law, not legal advice.
In force since 15 August 2023.
An AI governance rule binding public and private bodies.
As of 20 September 2026.
What it requires
- Upon discovering illegal content your generative AI service has produced, promptly stop generating it, stop transmitting it, eliminate it, carry out rectification such as retraining the model, and report it to the relevant competent authority, all under the same 'promptly' standard the text sets from the moment of discovery.
- If you discover a user has used the service to engage in illegal activity, warn the user, restrict their access to features, or suspend or terminate their access, in accordance with law and your service agreement.
- Preserve records of that user's illegal activity and report it to the relevant competent authority. The text sets no promptness standard or deadline for this second reporting duty, stating only that it follows discovery.
What this law does
Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page.
Article 14 of the Interim Measures for the Management of Generative AI Services requires a provider that discovers illegal content to promptly stop generating it, stop transmitting it, eliminate it, carry out rectification such as retraining the model, and report to the relevant competent authority.
The article separately requires a provider that discovers a user has used the service for illegal activity to warn, restrict, suspend, or terminate that user's access, preserve relevant records, and report to the relevant competent authority, and it states no promptness standard for that second reporting duty.
Both duties name only the relevant competent authority as addressee, without naming the Cyberspace Administration of China by title, and this reporting duty is distinct from the content-labeling duty the same Act imposes at Article 12.
When LexLint raises it
generates_contentdeploys_chatbot
Read the law
official CAC notice, read and confirmed directly, including the Article 14 text
Every line above is drawn from the primary source linked here, read on the date shown. This is a research summary, not legal advice.