Law / Peru

Ley 29733, rights of the data subject

Ley No. 29733, arts. 18-27 (rights of the data subject)

A citation is an address, not a summary. The first part names the law; what follows narrows it to the exact section, article or paragraph.

What follows is LexLint's own research summary of this law, not legal advice.

In force since 3 July 2011.

A data subject rights rule binding public and private bodies.

As of 19 September 2026.

What it requires

  • Tell a person, in detailed, simple, express and unequivocal terms before collecting their personal data, the purpose of the processing, who its recipients are, the data bank's existence and its owner's identity and address, whether their answers are mandatory or optional, any transfer, how long you will keep the data, and how to exercise their rights; an easily accessible and identifiable privacy policy satisfies this for data collected online.
  • Tell a person when you engage a new processor after they gave consent, or when a merger, portfolio acquisition, or similar transfer gives their data a new data-bank owner.
  • Give a person access, on request, to the personal data you hold on them, how you collected it, why, at whose request, and what transfers you made or plan to make.
  • Correct, update, include, or delete a person's personal data on request when it is inaccurate, incomplete, or has outlived the purpose or period for which it was collected, tell anyone you previously transferred it to about the change, and block the data from third-party access while the request is pending.
  • Stop supplying a person's personal data to others on their request to prevent supply, especially where the supply would affect a fundamental right.
  • Stop processing a person's personal data on a well-founded, legitimate objection tied to their specific situation, absent their consent, and delete the data where the objection is justified.
  • Do not base a decision that has legal effects on a person, or significantly affects them, solely on an automated evaluation of their personality or conduct, outside a contractual relationship or a public-entity entry evaluation, and let them state their own view.
  • Let a person bring an unanswered or denied rights request to the Autoridad Nacional de Protección de Datos Personales or to the Judiciary through a habeas data action, and expect to compensate them for harm your breach of the Law causes.

What it reaches

Obligation class

Data subject rights, Disclosure, Access restriction

What this law does

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page.

Article 18 gives the titleholder a right to be informed, in detailed, simple, express, and unequivocal terms before their data is collected, of the processing's purpose, its recipients, the data bank's existence and its owner's identity and address, whether answering is mandatory or optional, any transfer, the retention period, and how to exercise their rights, and lets a controller collecting data online satisfy this through an easily accessible and identifiable privacy policy; it also requires notice to the titleholder of a new processor engaged after consent was given, or of a new data-bank owner following a merger, portfolio acquisition, or similar transfer.

Article 19 gives a right of access to the information processed about oneself, how it was collected, why, at whose request, and what transfers were made or are planned.

Article 20 gives a right to update, include, rectify, or delete personal data that is inaccurate, incomplete, or obsolete, requires the processor to pass the correction on to anyone the data were previously transferred to, and requires the processor to block the data during the update, inclusion, rectification, or deletion process so no third party can access it, with an exception for a public entity that needs the data for its own competencies.

Article 21 gives a right to prevent the data from being supplied to others, especially where that would affect a fundamental right, though it does not reach the internal relationship between a data bank's owner and its processor. Article 22 gives a right to object to processing, absent the titleholder's consent, on well-founded and legitimate grounds tied to a specific personal situation, requiring deletion where the objection is justified.

Article 23 gives a right not to be subject to a decision with legal effects, or that significantly affects the titleholder, based solely on processing meant to evaluate aspects of their personality or conduct, except within a contractual relationship or an evaluation for entry into a public entity, and preserves the right to state one's own view to safeguard a legitimate interest.

Article 24 lets a titleholder whose rights are denied bring a claim to the Autoridad Nacional de Protección de Datos Personales, whose resolution exhausts the administrative channel and opens the door to a contencioso-administrativo action, or pursue a constitutional habeas data action before the Judiciary instead. Article 25 gives a right to compensation for harm the Law's breach causes.

Article 26 sets the fee for exercising these rights before a public-administration data bank by the general administrative-procedure law and leaves a private data bank's fee to special rules.

Article 27 lets a public-administration titleholder or processor deny access, deletion, or objection on grounds tied to protecting a third party's rights, or to avoid obstructing a pending judicial or administrative proceeding on tax, welfare, criminal, health, environmental, or administrative-infraction matters, or where the law otherwise so provides.

When LexLint raises it

  • crawls_web
  • trains_models
  • deploys_chatbot
  • automated_outreach
  • high_risk_decisions
  • generates_content

Read the law

consolidated text of Ley 29733
Ley de Protección de Datos Personales, as republished by LP Derecho (Pasión por el Derecho), a Peruvian legal publisher

Every line above is drawn from the primary source linked here, read on the date shown. This is a research summary, not legal advice.

Back to the example  ·  Lint your app