SOU 2025:101, Proposed National Implementation of the EU AI Act
Statens offentliga utredningar 2025:101, Anpassningar till AI-förordningen
A citation is an address, not a summary. The first part names the law; what follows narrows it to the exact section, article or paragraph.
Proposed: draft date not recorded.
An AI governance rule binding public and private bodies.
As of 6 September 2026.
What it requires
- Not yet in force, as proposed. Sweden has not yet designated a national market surveillance authority or enforcement route under the EU AI Act; SOU 2025:101 proposes Post- och telestyrelsen (PTS) as the coordinating authority and single point of contact, with Integritetsskyddsmyndigheten (IMY) handling the Article 5 prohibited-practices and Article 50.3 transparency duties, but no implementing law has been enacted.
What this law does
Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page.
Not yet in force. The inquiry submitted its report to the Government in October 2025, proposing a new law and ordinance, both still carrying the placeholder citation "lagen (2026:000) med kompletterande bestämmelser till EU:s förordning om artificiell intelligens", to designate Sweden's national market surveillance authorities under the EU AI Act.
As proposed, Post- och telestyrelsen (PTS) would be the market surveillance authority with the primary, residual responsibility for matters not assigned to another authority. PTS would separately be the coordinating market surveillance authority and the single point of contact under AI Act Article 70.2. Integritetsskyddsmyndigheten (IMY) would be responsible for market surveillance of the Article 5 prohibited AI practices, except where that responsibility is assigned elsewhere.
IMY would separately be responsible for market surveillance of the Article 50.3 transparency duties for certain AI system providers. PTS would also be the body establishing regulatory sandboxes for AI under the proposal, alongside IMY and Finansinspektionen for approving real-world testing of high-risk AI systems outside a sandbox. As proposed, a sanktionsavgift (administrative sanction fee) imposed under the future implementing law would be paid to Kammarkollegiet.
When LexLint raises it
high_risk_decisionsdeploys_chatbotgenerates_content