Loi n° 2008-12 du 25 janvier 2008 sur la Protection des Données à Caractère Personnel, catégories sensibles de données
Loi n° 2008-12 du 25 janvier 2008, arts. 20, 40-44 (catégories sensibles de données)
A citation is an address, not a summary. The first part names the law; what follows narrows it to the exact section, article or paragraph.
What follows is LexLint's own research summary of this law, not legal advice.
In force since 25 January 2008.
A sensitive categories rule binding public and private bodies.
As of 19 September 2026.
What it requires
- Before collecting or processing data revealing racial, ethnic, or regional origin, political opinion, religious or philosophical belief, trade union membership, sexual life, genetic data, or health, confirm one of the Act's narrow exceptions applies.
- Process data on criminal offences, convictions, or security measures only if you are a court, a public authority, a public-service body, or a legal auxiliary acting within your legal mission.
- Process health data only on one of the Act's listed grounds, such as the person's own consent or a public-health necessity, keep it under a health professional's supervision, and collect it from the person themselves unless collecting it elsewhere is necessary or they cannot supply it.
- Get the CDP's prior authorization before processing genetic data, health-related research data, data on criminal offences or convictions, or biometric data.
What it reaches
Obligation class
Prohibition, Consent, Biometric
What this law does
Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page.
Article 40 prohibits collecting or processing data revealing racial, ethnic or regional origin, filiation, political opinion, religious or philosophical belief, trade union membership, sexual life, genetic data, or health, and article 41 lifts that prohibition only where the person has made the data public, given written consent, needs the processing to protect a vital interest they cannot otherwise consent to, needs it for a legal claim, an open judicial or criminal proceeding, a public interest historical, statistical or scientific motive, a contract, a legal obligation, a public mission, or the internal activity of a nonprofit body with a political, philosophical, religious or trade union purpose.
Article 42 restricts processing data on offences, criminal convictions or security measures to courts, public authorities and public service bodies acting within their legal remit, and to legal auxiliaries strictly for the missions the law assigns them.
Article 43 makes processing health data lawful only on one of eight listed grounds, including the person's consent, data they have made public, protecting vital interests, a legal purpose, public health promotion including screening, preventing a real danger or a specific offence, a legal claim, or preventive medicine and care under a health professional bound by professional secrecy.
Article 44 requires health data to be collected from the person themselves unless collecting it elsewhere is necessary for the processing or the person cannot supply it themselves. Article 20 also requires the CDP's prior authorization before processing genetic data or health related research data, data on offences, convictions or security measures, or biometric data, so these categories carry a registration burden on top of article 40's prohibition and article 42's restriction.
When LexLint raises it
crawls_webtrains_modelsprocesses_biometricshandles_health_records
Read the law
Every line above is drawn from the primary source linked here, read on the date shown. This is a research summary, not legal advice.