Law / Senegal

Loi n° 2008-12 du 25 janvier 2008 sur la Protection des Données à Caractère Personnel, droits de la personne concernée

Loi n° 2008-12 du 25 janvier 2008, arts. 47-48, 58-69 (droits de la personne concernée)

A citation is an address, not a summary. The first part names the law; what follows narrows it to the exact section, article or paragraph.

What follows is LexLint's own research summary of this law, not legal advice.

In force since 25 January 2008.

A data subject rights rule binding public and private bodies.

As of 19 September 2026.

What it requires

  • Tell the person, at the time of collection, who is responsible for the processing, its purpose, the categories of data, whether a reply is mandatory or optional, and any recipients, and let them access, object to, correct, or delete their data on request.
  • Where you did not collect the data from the person directly, give them the same information when you record it or, if you plan to disclose it, no later than the first disclosure, unless it falls within the state-security, defence, criminal-enforcement, or major economic-interest exemption.
  • Do not access or write information on a user's terminal equipment by electronic transmission without telling them its purpose and how to object, unless the access only enables the communication or is strictly necessary for a service they expressly requested.
  • Give a person, on written request, access to their data and its origin, and a copy on payment of no more than the reproduction cost, and refer a disputed mismatch to the CDP for verification.
  • Do not send a person direct-marketing communications using their personal data unless they have first expressed consent to receive them.
  • Let a person object, free of charge and for legitimate reasons, to processing of their data, and correct, complete, update, block, or delete it within one month of a written request where it is inaccurate, incomplete, ambiguous, outdated, or unlawfully processed, notifying any third party the data was disclosed to.
  • Do not base a decision producing legal effects for a person solely on automated profiling or an automated evaluation of their personality, except where they had the chance to make observations or the decision grants their own request.

What it reaches

Obligation class

Data subject rights, Disclosure, Consent

What this law does

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page.

Article 58 requires a controller collecting data directly from the person to tell them, at the latest when collecting it, who is responsible for the processing, its purpose, the categories of data, the recipients, whether a reply is mandatory or optional and the consequences of not replying, their right to be removed from the file, their access and rectification rights, the retention period, and any transfer abroad.

Article 59 requires that same information to be given, when data is not collected from the person, at the time it is recorded or, if disclosure is planned, no later than the first disclosure, while article 60 exempts data used for state security, defence, public security, criminal enforcement, or an important economic or financial interest of the State.

Article 61 requires a controller accessing or writing information on a user's terminal equipment by electronic transmission to tell the user its purpose and how to object, unless the access only enables the communication or is strictly necessary for a service the user expressly requested.

Articles 62 and 63 give a person a written right to access their data, its origin and purpose, and a copy on payment of no more than the reproduction cost, and article 64 lets them refer a suspected mismatch between the data disclosed and the data actually processed to the CDP for verification.

Article 65 lets a patient's access right be exercised through a physician they designate, article 66 lets a controller resist manifestly abusive requests while carrying the burden of proving abuse, and article 67 routes access to a state security, defence or public security processing through a CDP member who investigates and decides what can be disclosed.

Article 68 gives a person the right to object, for legitimate reasons, to processing of their data, to be told before their data is first disclosed to or used by a third party for prospecting, and to object to that disclosure or use free of charge, and article 47 separately bars sending a person direct marketing communications by any means before they have expressed prior consent to receive them.

Article 69 lets a person demand that inaccurate, incomplete, ambiguous, outdated, or unlawfully processed data about them be corrected, completed, updated, blocked, or deleted, requires the controller to prove compliance within one month at no cost, and requires the controller to notify any third party the data was disclosed to.

Article 48 bars a judicial decision assessing a person's conduct from resting on automated processing that evaluates aspects of their personality, and bars any decision producing legal effects from resting solely on automated profiling, except a contractual decision where the person could make observations or a decision granting their own request.

When LexLint raises it

  • crawls_web
  • automated_outreach
  • high_risk_decisions

Read the law

Loi n° 2008-12 du 25 janvier 2008, official French text reproduced on the WIPO Lex legislation record for Senegal

Every line above is drawn from the primary source linked here, read on the date shown. This is a research summary, not legal advice.

Back to the example  ·  Lint your app