Law / Taiwan

Child and Juvenile Welfare and Rights Protection Act, internet content protection duties

Child and Juvenile Welfare and Rights Protection Act (兒童及少年福利與權益保障法), Arts. 2, 46, 46-1, 94

A citation is an address, not a summary. The first part names the law; what follows narrows it to the exact section, article or paragraph.

What follows is LexLint's own research summary of this law, not legal advice.

In force.

An age-appropriate design code rule binding private bodies.

As of 22 September 2026.

What this law does

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page.

The communications and broadcasting competent authority must entrust private organizations with establishing content-protection agencies for children's and juveniles' internet use, and an internet platform provider, defined broadly as any provider of internet platform services including storage space, websites, or web-linking services, must establish self-regulatory norms and adopt clear, feasible protection measures against content harmful to a child's or juvenile's physical and mental health (Article 46).

Where the competent authority for the relevant business notifies a platform provider that its content is harmful or that its protection measures are inadequate, the provider must restrict a child's or juvenile's access or browsing, or remove the content beforehand; a provider that fails to do so is fined NT$60,000 to NT$300,000 and ordered to improve within a set period (Article 94).

Article 46-1 separately prohibits anyone from disseminating or transmitting content harmful to a child's or juvenile's physical and mental health on the internet without taking clear, feasible protection measures or cooperating with a platform's protection mechanisms, in a way that makes the content accessible to a child or juvenile. "Children and juveniles" means persons under eighteen (Article 2).

The Act does not itself prescribe a specific age-verification method, leaving the content-classification system, filtering software, and self-regulatory norms to be developed under the competent authority's protection mechanisms.

If you get it wrong

Private right of actionNo

Penalty structure

Article 94 fines an internet platform provider NT$60,000 to NT$300,000 for failing to take measures to restrict a child's or juvenile's access or to remove harmful content beforehand, in violation of Article 46, paragraph 3, and orders improvement within a set period, with continuous penalties for continued non-compliance.

Rule
Fixed only
As of
22 September 2026
Currency
TWD
Fixed cap
300,000

Who enforces it

Enforcement body

The competent authority for the relevant business (the communications and broadcasting competent authority for internet platform providers, per Article 46)

What it reaches

Age threshold

18

Covered services

Internet platform providers broadly defined: any provider of internet platform services after connecting to the internet, including providing storage space on the internet, or building websites to provide information, value-added services, or web-linking services (Article 46)

When LexLint raises it

  • serves_minors

Read the law

Laws and Regulations Database of the Republic of China (Taiwan), Ministry of Justice, official English translation

Every line above is drawn from the primary source linked here, read on the date shown. This is a research summary, not legal advice.

Back to the example  ·  Lint your app