Law note · Washington

Washington My Health My Data Act (MHMDA)

cite RCW 19.373 stage IN FORCE in force since 2024-03-31 kind Personal data binds private bodies reviewed 2026-08-29

What it asks of an app

  • Washington's My Health My Data Act reaches consumer health data broadly: personal information linked or reasonably linkable to a consumer that identifies their past, present, or future physical or mental health status, including inferences and non-health data that indicate a health status, such as location data suggesting an attempt to obtain reproductive or gender-affirming care.
  • Do not implement a geofence around an entity that provides in-person health care services to identify or track consumers seeking care, collect their health data, or send them related notifications, messages, or advertisements.
  • A violation of this Act is per se an unfair or deceptive act under the Washington Consumer Protection Act, which carries its own private right of action; a federal class action alleging SDK-based location and biometric data harvesting in violation of this Act was reported pending as of the sources consulted in this research, not independently confirmed against the court docket.

When LexLint raises it

  • crawls_web
  • trains_models
  • automated_outreach

What we found

MHMDA defines consumer health data as personal information that is linked or reasonably linkable to a consumer and that identifies the consumer's past, present, or future physical or mental health status, a definition that reaches inferences and non-health data indicating health status, such as precise location data that could indicate an attempt to obtain reproductive or gender-affirming care.

Because 'consumer health data' is itself defined as a subset of 'personal information,' and 'personal information' does not include publicly available information (RCW 19.373.010(18)(b)) or deidentified data, scraped health-indicating data that fits MHMDA's own publicly-available definition falls outside its coverage; that carve-out, however, does not extend to biometric data, which MHMDA's 'publicly available information' definition expressly excludes even when otherwise public (RCW 19.373.010(22)).

RCW 19.373.080 makes it unlawful to implement a geofence around an entity providing in-person health care services to identify or track consumers, collect their health data, or send them related notifications, messages, or advertisements. RCW 19.373.090 provides that any violation of the chapter is per se an unfair or deceptive act under the Washington Consumer Protection Act, chapter 19.86 RCW, which carries a long-standing private right of action, giving MHMDA its own enforcement mechanism.

This is now live litigation risk, not theoretical: Maxwell v. Amazon.com, Inc., No. 2:25-cv-261 (W.D. Wash., filed February 10, 2025), a putative class action alleging Amazon harvested location and biometric data via SDKs without consent in violation of MHMDA, was reported pending by contemporaneous legal commentary as of the sources consulted; the docket itself was not independently read in this research, so treat its procedural posture as reported rather than verified.

Primary source

official text, Washington State Legislature (app.leg.wa.gov)
the Maxwell v. Amazon litigation status is reported by contemporaneous legal commentary and was not independently confirmed against the court docket

← Back to the example  ·  Lint your app →