Law / Albania

Albania

privacy

Albania is not a General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) jurisdiction. Its comprehensive personal data statute is Law No. 124/2024 On the Protection of Personal Data, in force since 31 January 2025 and repealing Law No. 9887/2008 the same date.

The law is closely modelled on the GDPR and the EU Law Enforcement Directive but carries its own numbering and gaps: primary text confirms biometric data, including facial images, as an explicit special category, a real adequacy-or-safeguards cross-border transfer regime, and a standalone civil damages right under Article 88. A breach notification deadline and the full lawful-basis and data-subject-rights chapters were not independently confirmed against primary text in this research pass.

7 instruments named 1 researched in detail As of 2026-08-24

Instruments

Each one links to its LexLint note, which carries what it requires and what it flags on.

Comprehensive regime

Law No. 124/2024 On the Protection of Personal Data

cite Law No. 124/2024 (Ligj Nr. 124/2024) On the Protection of Personal Data, in force 31 January 2025 stage In effect since 2025-01-31 source Official statute PDF hosted by the Commissioner for the Right to Information and Personal Data Protection (idp.al), read in full through crawler infrastructure (174,136 characters, untruncated)

Law No. 124/2024 replaced the pre-General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Law No. 9887/2008 and, per IAPP, KPMG, ARS Firm and EY commentary, transposes GDPR-style lawful bases and controller and processor duties, though this research did not independently confirm the lawful-basis article against primary text.

Primary text confirms biometric data, including facial images, as an explicit special category, a real cross-border transfer regime requiring adequate protection or specific safeguards, and a standalone civil damages right under Article 88, separate from the administrative complaint route to the Commissioner for the Right to Information and Personal Data Protection.

A breach notification deadline and the full data-subject-rights response timeline were not located in this research; KPMG reports some articles phase in over up to two years from the effective date, without naming which.

What it asks of an app

This summary covers the instruments LexLint has researched to a stage. Instruments named in the corpus but not yet researched are counted above and are not listed here. Every entry carries its own primary source on its note page. This is a research index, not legal advice.