Law / Burkina Faso

Burkina Faso

4 of 7 named instruments researched to a stage, across three of the six areas of law we track: 4 in force. As of 4 September 2026.

  1. AI law none researched
  2. Privacy law 1
  3. Scraping law 2
  4. Cybersecurity law none researched
  5. Age gating law none researched
  6. News aggregation law 1

in forceenacted but not yet in forceproposedrepealed, withdrawn or blocked

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page.

Privacy law1 instrument, 1 in force

Research summary (271 words)

Burkina Faso's comprehensive personal-data statute is Loi n°001-2021/AN du 30 mars 2021 portant protection des personnes à l'égard du traitement des données à caractère personnel, which repealed and replaced the country's first data-protection law, Loi n°010-2004/AN.

It applies to any automated or non-automated processing of personal data relating to natural persons, reaches a controller established in Burkina Faso or one that processes from Burkina Faso's territory without being established there, and carries a broad definition of sensitive data (health, biometric, genetic, sexual-life, ethnic, political, religious, trade-union, and criminal-record data) that requires the data subject's express consent to collect or process.

Processing generally requires prior consent, subject to enumerated legal exceptions, and the law expressly regulates purely automated decisions, including ones relying on artificial intelligence, giving a person the right to know and contest the logic behind such a decision.

Cross-border transfer requires the destination country or organization to assure a level of protection adequate to Burkina Faso's own and, ordinarily, a prior authorization from the Commission de l'informatique et des libertés (CIL), the independent administrative authority the law creates as the country's data-protection regulator.

The law does not impose a proactive duty on a controller to notify the CIL or affected individuals of a data breach; its only breach-adjacent provision is an administrative fine for unauthorized disclosure caused by imprudence or negligence.

Enforcement combines administrative sanctions the CIL can impose directly, including a turnover-based forfeitary fine and a schedule of fixed-range fines for specific enumerated violations, with a private right of action letting a data subject seek damages, and a cross-reference to the Penal Code's information-technology offense provisions for criminal exposure.

Comprehensive regime

Loi n°001-2021/AN du 30 mars 2021 portant protection des personnes à l'égard du traitement des données à caractère personnel

Loi n°001-2021/AN du 30 mars 2021 portant protection des personnes à l'égard du traitement des données à caractère personnelLoi n°001-2021/AN, official text as published by the Assemblée nationale du Burkina Faso on its own storage domain

In force since 30 March 2021. Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Burkina Faso's comprehensive personal-data statute, adopted by the National Assembly on 30 March 2021 and enforced by the Commission de l'informatique et des libertés (CIL).

It requires a lawful basis, ordinarily the data subject's prior consent, for processing personal data, and express consent for sensitive categories (health, biometric, genetic, sexual-life, ethnic, political, religious, trade-union, and criminal-record data), with CIL authorization required before biometric or genetic data is processed in the private sector, before files are interconnected, before a national identification number is processed, or before purely automated profiling is used for predictive purposes.

It gives data subjects rights to information, access (exercised by a parent or legal guardian on a minor's behalf), rectification, erasure, objection, and an explicit right to be forgotten regarding personal data made public about their past private life, and it bars a legal, administrative, or private decision from resting solely on automated processing, including artificial-intelligence-based processing, that evaluates a person's profile or personality, giving the person a right to know and contest its logic.

It prohibits unsolicited direct-marketing communications absent the recipient's prior consent. A cross-border transfer requires the destination to assure an adequate level of protection, ordinarily confirmed by a prior CIL authorization, subject to narrow derogations. The law does not impose a proactive breach-notification duty on a controller.

Enforcement combines administrative sanctions the CIL can pronounce directly, a private right of action letting a data subject seek damages for the harm suffered, and a cross-reference to the Penal Code's information-technology offense provisions for criminal exposure. The law repealed and replaced Burkina Faso's first data-protection statute, Loi n°010-2004/AN.

What it requires

Scraping law2 instruments, 2 in force

Research summary (319 words)

Open-web crawling of public pages carries no dedicated Burkina Faso statute.

The applicable authority for unauthorized-access questions is Livre VII, Titre I of the Penal Code (Loi n°025-2018/AN du 31 mai 2018), which criminalizes intentionally and without right accessing (Art. 711-1) or remaining present in (Art. 711-2) all or part of a computer system, with an aggravated penalty where the access or continued presence results in data suppression, modification, or alteration; no located Burkinabe court decision construes how authorization is read for a public, unauthenticated page.

No statute or case law addressing terms-of-service enforceability (browsewrap versus clickwrap), or whether login or acceptance of terms changes the legal picture, was located; ordinary contract-formation principles under Burkina Faso's Civil Code and the OHADA Uniform Act on General Commercial Law would be the applicable general law for a contract-formation question, but this is unsettled rather than a specific regime.

Copyright protects a database as a compilation rather than through a separate sui generis database right: Loi n°048-2019/AN du 12 novembre 2019 excludes reproducing the whole or a substantial part of a database even from its otherwise-permitted private-copy exception (Art. 22), meaning a database is a protected work whose substantial reproduction the rights holder can prevent; the same Law excludes official texts, the news of the day, and mere facts and data from copyright protection altogether (Art. 10), and its enumerated exceptions include press reviews and current-events reporting (Art. 23) rather than a general fair-use or text-and-data-mining carve-out, and nothing in the Law addresses AI training specifically.

Personal-data reach over scraped public personal data is governed by Loi n°001-2021/AN, researched in full under the privacy topic; its scope provisions carry no publicly-available-data exemption, so personal data scraped from a public source remains within the regime's reach. No specific unfair-competition or misappropriation doctrine addressed to scraping, and no case law or regulatory statement giving robots.txt legal weight or addressing AI-training-specific access rules, was located.

Computer misuse

Loi n°025-2018/AN du 31 mai 2018 portant Code pénal, computer and data systems offenses (Livre VII, Titre I, Chapitre 1)

Loi n°025-2018/AN du 31 mai 2018 portant Code pénal Livre VII, Titre I, Chapitre 1 (infractions relatives aux systèmes et données informatiques, Art. 711-1 à 711-13)Loi n°025-2018/AN portant Code pénal

In force since 31 May 2018. Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Burkina Faso's general computer-misuse title, added to the Penal Code by Loi n°025-2018/AN. Article 711-1 punishes intentionally and without right accessing all or part of a computer system, with a heavier penalty where the access results in the suppression, modification, or alteration of the system's data; Article 711-2 separately punishes unauthorized continued presence in a system, on the same escalating structure.

Article 711-3 punishes hindering or falsifying a system's operation; Article 711-4 the unauthorized introduction of data; Article 711-5 the unauthorized interception of non-public data transmissions; Article 711-6 the unauthorized damaging, deletion, alteration, or suppression of data.

Article 711-10 punishes producing, selling, or possessing a device, program, password, or access code intended to commit any of the above offenses, but carves out production, sale, or possession that does not aim to commit an offense, such as authorized testing or protecting a computer system.

Article 711-12 punishes taking a person's digital identity or using their identifying data to disturb them or harm their honor, private life, or property, and Article 711-13 separately punishes intentionally and without right reproducing, extracting, or copying computer data belonging to another. The title does not define "without right" for a public, unauthenticated web page specifically, and no Burkinabe court decision construing Articles 711-1 to 711-13 in that context was located.

What it requires

Database right

Loi n°048-2019/AN du 12 novembre 2019 portant protection de la propriété littéraire et artistique, database and news exceptions

Loi n°048-2019/AN Database and News-Facts Exclusions (Arts. 10 et 22), portant protection de la propriété littéraire et artistique, 12 novembre 2019Loi n°048-2019/AN, full text as republished by WIPO Lex, WIPO's own legislative database

In force since 23 December 2019. Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Burkina Faso's copyright statute, which repealed and replaced the 1999 literary and artistic property law. Article 10 excludes official legislative, administrative, or judicial texts and their official translations, the news of the day, and mere facts and data from copyright protection outright.

Article 22 lists the private-copy exception's limits and expressly excludes reproducing the whole or a substantial part of a database from it, which means a database is treated as a protected compilation whose substantial reproduction the rights holder can otherwise prevent; there is no separate sui generis database right of the EU kind.

Article 23 lets a person, once a work has been lawfully disclosed and its author and source are clearly credited, make short critical, polemical, pedagogical, scientific, or informational quotations and analyses, compile press reviews, and reproduce or broadcast, even in full and in original or translated form, current political, social, economic, or religious news articles and public speeches for current-events informational purposes.

None of these exceptions is framed as a text-and-data-mining carve-out, and nothing in the Law addresses AI training specifically.

What it requires

News aggregation law1 instrument, 1 in force

Research summary (198 words)

Burkina Faso has no press-publisher neighbouring right, no mandatory platform-to-publisher bargaining code, no recognized hot-news misappropriation doctrine distinct from ordinary copyright law, and no located statute or case law addressing hyperlinking or framing liability specifically; each of those dimensions is a sourced absence rather than an unresolved question.

The relevant instrument is Loi n°048-2019/AN du 12 novembre 2019 portant protection de la propriété littéraire et artistique, which excludes the news of the day and mere facts and data from copyright protection outright (Art. 10), so a bare fact or news item is never protectable regardless of who first reported it.

The same Law lets a person, once a work is lawfully disclosed and its author and source are clearly credited, compile press reviews and reproduce or broadcast current political, social, economic, or religious news articles and public speeches, even in full and in translation, for current-events informational purposes (Art. 23); nothing limits that exception to short extracts, and no Burkinabe court decision applying it to a systematic news aggregator, as opposed to a traditional press review, was located.

The Law predates the concept of a machine-readable text-and-data-mining reservation entirely, so no opt-out mechanism of that kind exists either.

Snippet reproduction

Loi n°048-2019/AN du 12 novembre 2019 portant protection de la propriété littéraire et artistique, press review and current-events exception (Art. 23) and facts exclusion (Art. 10)

Loi n°048-2019/AN Press Review and Current-Events Exception (Art. 23), portant protection de la propriété littéraire et artistique, 12 novembre 2019Loi n°048-2019/AN, full text as republished by WIPO Lex, WIPO's own legislative database

In force since 23 December 2019. Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 10 excludes official legislative, administrative, or judicial texts and their official translations, the news of the day, and mere facts and data from copyright protection outright: a bare fact, or the news of the day as such, is never a protected work under Burkinabe law, whichever outlet reports it first.

Article 23 separately lets any person, once a work has been lawfully disclosed, and provided the author's name and source are clearly credited, make short critical, polemical, pedagogical, scientific, or informational quotations and analyses, compile press reviews, and reproduce or broadcast, even in full and in original or translated form, current political, social, economic, or religious news articles and public speeches delivered before political, administrative, judicial, or academic assemblies, for current-events informational purposes.

The exception is not capped at a headline-length or short-extract threshold and is not confined to the press industry; whether it reaches a systematic aggregator's reproduction of headlines and snippets, as opposed to a traditional press review or a broadcaster's current-events report, has not been tested in a reported Burkinabe decision.

Burkina Faso has no separate press-publisher neighbouring right, no compelled platform-to-publisher bargaining regime, no recognized hot-news or misappropriation doctrine distinct from ordinary copyright and unfair-competition law, and no located case law on hyperlinking or framed display.

Note and primary source

This page covers the instruments LexLint has researched to a stage. Instruments named in the corpus but not yet researched are counted in the head and are not listed here. Every entry carries its own primary source on its note page. This is a research index, not legal advice.