Law / Bermuda

Bermuda

All 10 named instruments researched to a stage, across five of the six areas of law we track: 10 in force. As of 15 September 2026.

  1. AI law 1
  2. Privacy law 5
  3. Scraping law 2
  4. Cybersecurity law none researched
  5. Age gating law 1
  6. News aggregation law 1

in forceenacted but not yet in forceproposedrepealed, withdrawn or blocked

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page.

AI law1 instrument, 1 in force

Research summary (147 words)

Bermuda has no AI-transparency, AI-risk-obligations, AI-training-data, AI-governance, or AI-sector-rules statute.

The Criminal Code Act 1907 bans making, printing, publishing, distributing, transmitting, selling, importing or exporting child abusive material or child pornography, defined to include a visual representation, whether or not made by electronic or mechanical means, that shows a child who is, or is depicted as being, engaged in explicit sexual activity, a definition wide enough to reach a computer-generated or AI-synthesised depiction and binding on any person.

The Bermuda Monetary Authority published a discussion paper in July 2025 setting out a principles-based supervisory approach to artificial intelligence use by regulated financial-services firms, covering governance, model validation, human oversight and generative and agentic AI risk, and continued gathering industry feedback into early 2026; it is guidance for a supervised sector rather than legislation and creates no generally binding duty, so it is not recorded as an instrument.

AI prohibited practices

Criminal Code Act 1907, making and distributing child abusive material or child pornography

Criminal Code Act 1907 (Bermuda), 1907:13, s. 182F (making, distributing etc. of child abusive material or child pornography)Criminal Code Act 1907, Consolidated Laws of Bermuda

In force since 7 May 2008. Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Section 182F makes it an offence to knowingly make, print or publish child abusive material or child pornography, liable on conviction on indictment to ten years' imprisonment or on summary conviction to five years, and a separate offence to knowingly distribute, transmit, make available, sell, import or export such material, carrying the same penalties.

Child pornography is defined as a photograph, film, video or other visual representation, whether or not made by electronic or mechanical means, that shows a child who is, or is depicted as being, engaged in explicit sexual activity, or whose dominant characteristic is the depiction, for a sexual purpose, of a sexual organ or the anal region; the definition does not require the depicted child to be a real, identifiable individual, so a computer-generated or AI-synthesised depiction meeting it can fall within the ban. For sections 182C to 182H, "child" means a person under the age of sixteen.

What it requires

Privacy law5 instruments, 5 in force

Research summary (213 words)

Bermuda's comprehensive personal-data statute is the Personal Information Protection Act 2016 (2016:43), assented 27 July 2016, which applies to every organisation that uses personal information in Bermuda wholly or partly by automated means.

Its administrative provisions (the Privacy Commissioner's office and the Act's general and consequential provisions) came into operation on 2 December 2016, while the remaining provisions commence on a day the Minister appoints by Gazette notice, and the text read does not reproduce that notice; a large wave of amendments made by the Personal Information Protection Amendment Act 2023 took effect across most of the Act's substantive provisions on 1 January 2025.

The Act names racial origin, political opinions, religious or other beliefs, physical or mental health or disability, family status, trade union membership, biometric information and genetic information as sensitive personal information, carries no general carve-out for publicly available personal data, and lets an organisation transfer personal information to an overseas third party only while it remains responsible for the transfer's compliance with the Act, subject to case-by-case exceptions rather than a jurisdiction adequacy list.

An individual whose data is used for a child-directed information society service, or who is known to be a child, is protected by a parental-consent requirement rather than by an age-verification duty on the service.

Breach notification

Personal Information Protection Act 2016, breach of security notification

Personal Information Protection Act 2016 (Bermuda), 2016:43, s. 14 (breach of security)Personal Information Protection Act 2016, Consolidated Laws of Bermuda

In force. Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Where a breach of security leads to the loss, unlawful destruction, or unauthorised disclosure of or access to personal information that is likely to adversely affect an individual, the responsible organisation must, without undue delay, notify the Privacy Commissioner of the breach and then notify any individual affected.

The notification to the Commissioner must describe the nature of the breach, its likely consequences for the individual, and the measures taken and to be taken to address it, so the Commissioner can decide whether to order further steps and can maintain a record of the breach.

What it requires

Comprehensive regime

Personal Information Protection Act 2016, application and general principles

Personal Information Protection Act 2016 (Bermuda), 2016:43, Parts 1-2 (application, exclusions and general principles)Personal Information Protection Act 2016, Consolidated Laws of Bermuda

In force. Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

The Act binds every organisation that uses personal information in Bermuda wholly or partly by automated means, excluding personal or domestic use, artistic, literary or journalistic use in the public interest, and business-contact information used to reach an individual in their capacity as an employee or official.

An organisation must adopt suitable measures and policies to give effect to its obligations, use personal information fairly and only for specified purposes, and provide privacy notices.

Where an information society service is targeted at children, or the organisation has actual knowledge it is using a child's personal information, the organisation must obtain verifiable consent from a parent or guardian before relying on consent as the basis for using it, and may not seek information about the child's parents or guardians beyond what is needed to obtain that consent.

The administrative provisions of the Act, including the Commissioner's office, came into operation on 2 December 2016; the remaining provisions commence on a day the Minister appoints by notice in the Gazette, which is not reproduced in the text read, and the Personal Information Protection Amendment Act 2023 brought amendments to most of the Act's substantive sections into effect on 1 January 2025.

What it requires

Cross border transfer

Personal Information Protection Act 2016, cross-border transfer of personal information

Personal Information Protection Act 2016 (Bermuda), 2016:43, s. 15 (transfer of personal information to an overseas third party)Personal Information Protection Act 2016, Consolidated Laws of Bermuda

In force. Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

An organisation that transfers personal information to an overseas third party, whether for use on the organisation's behalf or for the third party's own business purposes, remains responsible for that transfer's compliance with the Act. An organisation may avoid full accountability for the transfer where it reasonably assesses the circumstances and concludes the transfer is small-scale, occasional, and unlikely to prejudice the rights of an individual, among other exceptions.

The Privacy Commissioner may recommend that the Minister designate a jurisdiction as providing a comparable level of protection for section 15 purposes. The Commissioner may separately order, at the Commissioner's discretion, that an organisation be permitted to transfer personal information to an overseas third party where the organisation has reasonably demonstrated it cannot comply with the general accountability rule.

What it requires

Data subject rights

Personal Information Protection Act 2016, rights of individuals

Personal Information Protection Act 2016 (Bermuda), 2016:43, ss. 17-20 (rights of individuals)Personal Information Protection Act 2016, Consolidated Laws of Bermuda

In force. Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

An individual may request access to personal information an organisation holds about them, subject to exemptions including for information that would prejudice medical treatment. An individual may request correction, blocking, erasure or destruction of personal information containing an error or omission.

An individual who suffers financial loss or emotional distress from an organisation's failure to comply with the Act is entitled to compensation, determined by the court, unless the organisation proves it took such care as was reasonably necessary to comply.

What it requires

Enforcement supervision

Personal Information Protection Act 2016, Commissioner, enforcement and offences

Personal Information Protection Act 2016 (Bermuda), 2016:43, ss. 26-46, 48 (the Privacy Commissioner, orders, offences and penalties)Personal Information Protection Act 2016, Consolidated Laws of Bermuda

In force. Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

The Privacy Commissioner for Bermuda, a public office appointed by the Governor, investigates complaints, mediates disputes, and on completing an inquiry may make an order requiring an organisation to give access, rectify or destroy personal information, or take other steps to remedy a breach of the Act.

The Commissioner's office and general powers came into operation on 2 December 2016; the offences and penalties provisions are not among the sections the Act's endnote names as having commenced on that date, and their own commencement day is not reproduced in the text read.

A person who fails to comply with a Commissioner's order or notice, contravenes the sensitive-personal-information restriction, destroys evidence during an investigation, or fails to notify a breach of security, commits an offence liable on summary conviction, for an individual, to a fine not exceeding $25,000 or imprisonment not exceeding two years or both, and on conviction on indictment, for a person other than an individual, to a fine not exceeding $250,000.

What it requires

Scraping law2 instruments, 2 in force

Research summary (197 words)

Open-web crawling of an unauthenticated public page is not itself an offence in Bermuda, but the Computer Misuse Act 1996 criminalises causing a computer to perform a function to secure access to a program or data without authority, where access is unauthorised only if the person is not entitled to control access of that kind and lacks the consent of someone who is, a test that turns on authorisation rather than on a login requirement.

The Act contains no separate provision on terms-of-service enforceability or on whether accepting a website's terms changes the legality of later access.

The Copyright and Designs Act 2004 creates a genuine sui generis database right, modelled on the European right, protecting a database in which there has been substantial investment in obtaining, verifying or presenting its contents, alongside fair-dealing exceptions for research, criticism, review and reporting current events narrower than a dedicated text-and-data-mining exception.

Personal data collected by scraping falls within the Personal Information Protection Act 2016 researched under the privacy topic. No unfair-competition or misappropriation doctrine, and no statute or reported Bermudian decision addressing the legal weight of a robots.txt instruction or an AI-training-specific rule, was identified in the legislation read.

Computer misuse

Computer Misuse Act 1996, unauthorised access and modification offences

Computer Misuse Act 1996 (Bermuda), 1996:16, ss. 3-6A (unauthorised access, modification and related offences)Computer Misuse Act 1996, Consolidated Laws of Bermuda

In force. Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Section 3 makes it an offence for a person, knowing the access is unauthorised, to cause a computer to perform any function with intent to secure access to a program or data held in any computer, whether or not the intent is directed at a particular program, data or computer. Access is unauthorised only if the person is not entitled to control access of that kind and lacks the consent of someone who is, so authorisation rather than a technical measure is what the Act tests.

Section 4 aggravates the offence where the unauthorised access is committed with intent to commit or facilitate a further indictable offence. Section 5 separately criminalises unauthorised modification of computer material, and section 6A unauthorised conduct causing a computer to cease to function permanently or temporarily. The Act's text does not carry a separate commencement clause beyond the date of assent.

What it requires

Age gating law1 instrument, 1 in force

Research summary (166 words)

Bermuda has no social-media minor-access restriction, app-store age-verification requirement, or age-appropriate design code. Adult content is instead regulated through the Obscene Publications Act 1973, which bars publishing an obscene article to, or in the presence of, a person under the age of sixteen years, alongside general offences of importing, publicly publishing, or possessing an obscene article for gain.

"Publishes" is defined broadly to include distributing, circulating, selling, letting on hire, giving or lending an article, or showing, playing or projecting one containing matter to be looked at or a record, so the restriction reaches a distributor's supply of obscene material rather than merely its public exhibition.

The Act separately empowers the Minister to make regulations restricting the sale of a classified magazine to sections of the public selected by reference to immaturity of age, though no such regulations have been located. The Criminal Code Act 1907's child abusive material and child pornography offences criminalise material depicting a minor rather than gating access to adult content generally.

Adult content age verification (AV)

Obscene Publications Act 1973, restriction on publishing an obscene article to a minor

Obscene Publications Act 1973 (Bermuda), 1973:48, s. 3 (offences involving obscene articles)Obscene Publications Act 1973, Consolidated Laws of Bermuda

In force. Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Section 3(1)(d) makes it an offence to publish an obscene article to, or in the presence of, a person under the age of sixteen years. "Publishes" is defined to include distributing, circulating, selling, letting on hire, giving or lending a thing, or showing, playing or projecting a thing containing matter to be looked at or a record.

The same section separately bars importing an obscene article, publicly publishing one, or having one for publication for gain, and section 2(3) deems a thing obscene if it is child abusive material or child pornography within the meaning of Part X of the Criminal Code. A defendant is not convicted if they prove they had not examined the article and had no reasonable cause to suspect it was obscene.

Note and primary source

News aggregation law1 instrument, 1 in force

Research summary (102 words)

Bermuda has no press-publisher neighbouring right and no platform-to-publisher bargaining code; the Copyright and Designs Act 2004 is the only law reaching an aggregator's reproduction of Bermudian news content.

Section 42 permits fair dealing with a work, other than a photograph, for the purpose of reporting current events without infringing copyright, provided it is accompanied by sufficient acknowledgement, and no acknowledgement is required for reporting current events by sound recording, film, broadcast or cable programme. The same section separately permits fair dealing for criticism or review.

No statute or reported Bermudian decision addresses hyperlinking, framing, hot-news misappropriation, or a machine-readable text-and-data-mining opt-out.

This page covers the instruments LexLint has researched to a stage. Instruments named in the corpus but not yet researched are counted in the head and are not listed here. Every entry carries its own primary source on its note page. This is a research index, not legal advice.