Law / Congo

Congo

3 of 4 named instruments researched to a stage, across three of the six areas of law we track: 3 in force. As of 7 September 2026.

  1. AI law none researched
  2. Privacy law 1
  3. Scraping law 1
  4. Cybersecurity law none researched
  5. Age gating law none researched
  6. News aggregation law 1

in forceenacted but not yet in forceproposedrepealed, withdrawn or blocked

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page.

Privacy law1 instrument, 1 in force

Research summary (236 words)

The Republic of the Congo's comprehensive data-protection statute is Law No. 29-2019 of 10 October 2019 on the Protection of Personal Data, signed by President Denis Sassou-N'Guesso and published in the Journal Officiel of 7 November 2019.

It binds any natural or legal person, public or private, processing personal data on Congolese territory or using processing means located there, conditions processing on the data subject's consent or an enumerated alternative ground, requires a prior declaration or the national commission's authorization for most processing, arms the data subject with rights of information, access, portability, rectification, erasure and objection, imposes a seventy-two-hour breach-notification duty toward the commission, restricts cross-border transfer to countries offering a sufficient level of protection, and backs these duties with administrative fines of one million to one hundred million CFA francs.

Breach of the Law's provisions is separately punished under the Penal Code and under Law No. 27-2020 on combating cybercrime, whose own Chapter 6 criminalises processing without the required formalities, unlawful or undeclared processing, and processing of sensitive-category data with imprisonment of one to five years.

The Law's sensitive-category definition (Article 4) reaches genetic data, data concerning minors, offence and criminal-conviction data, and biometric data, alongside data revealing ethnic or regional origin, political opinions, religious or philosophical beliefs, trade union membership, sex life or health (Article 14), so a service processing a biometric identifier falls within the Law's heightened prior-authorization regime for sensitive data.

Comprehensive regime

Law No. 29-2019 on the Protection of Personal Data

Loi n° 29-2019 du 10 octobre 2019 portant protection des données à caractère personnel, Journal Officiel n° 45-2019 du jeudi 7 novembre 2019Text of Law No. 29-2019

In force. Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 2 applies the Law to the collection, storage and any other use of personal data by a natural person, the State, decentralised administrative entities, or a legal person of public or private law, whether the controller is established in Congo or uses processing means located there.

Article 3 excludes only processing by a natural person for exclusively personal or domestic activities (where the data is not systematically communicated to third parties or disseminated) and processing concerning public security, defence, or the investigation of offences.

Article 5 conditions processing on the data subject's consent, unless the processing is necessary to comply with a legal obligation, perform a public-interest mission, protect vital interests, or another enumerated ground applies; a minor may consent alone from age sixteen, and jointly with a parent below that age (Article 15 area).

Articles 33 to 39 require most processing to be declared to the commission, with prior authorization required for processing of genetic data, health research data, offence or conviction data, an interconnection of files, a national identification number, or biometric data (Article 37).

Article 4 defines special categories of personal data as genetic data, data concerning minors, data on offences, convictions or security measures, and biometric data, and Article 14 separately restricts processing of data revealing ethnic or regional origin, political opinions, religious or philosophical beliefs, trade union membership, sex life, or health. Articles 46 to 61 give the data subject rights to information, access, portability, rectification and objection.

Articles 23 to 25 permit cross-border transfer only to a country the commission finds offers a sufficient level of protection, subject to derogations for consented, one-off, non-massive transfers or a commission-approved guarantee. Articles 74 to 78 require the controller to notify the commission of a personal-data breach within seventy-two hours where feasible, and to communicate a high-risk breach to the affected person.

Article 93 empowers the commission to warn, order compliance, suspend processing for up to three months, withdraw authorization, or impose an administrative fine of one million to one hundred million CFA francs, with recourse to the Supreme Court (Article 97). Article 98 provides that breach of the Law's provisions is separately punished under the Penal Code and under the law on combating cybercrime.

What it requires

Scraping law1 instrument, 1 in force

Research summary (239 words)

The Republic of the Congo has no scraping-specific statute.

Law No. 27-2020 of 5 June 2020 on combating cybercrime is the operative computer-misuse law: Article 4 criminalises fraudulently accessing or attempting to access all or part of an information system, Article 5 criminalises fraudulently remaining or attempting to remain connected to one, Article 6 criminalises hindering or attempting to hinder a system's functioning, and Article 63 criminalises fraudulently copying or attempting to copy computer data to a third party's prejudice.

On a plain reading, an unauthenticated read of a public page does not itself defeat any of these provisions, since none turns on the page being public or private; the offence attaches to accessing, remaining connected to, or copying from a system without authorization. The Law applies to any person, of any nationality, who commits an offence through information and communication technology in the Republic of the Congo (Article 2).

No reported Congolese decision applies these provisions to a web crawler or scraper as opposed to a conventional intrusion.

Congo's copyright statute, Law No. 24-82 of 7 July 1982 on Copyright and Related Rights, is named in Law No. 27-2020's own definitions chapter as the source of the legal definition of a database, but its own text could not be located through any reached channel; the cell for a copyright-based or database-right dimension of this topic is accordingly unreached rather than researched, and is noted as a gap below.

Computer misuse

Law on Combating Cybercrime, Unauthorised Access, Interference and Fraudulent Copying of Data

Loi n° 27-2020 du 5 juin 2020 portant lutte contre la cybercriminalité, arts. 4, 5, 6, 63Text of Law No. 27-2020 on combating cybercrime, reproduced by droit-afrique.com, read through an Internet Archive capture

archived copyRead from a public archive copy, not the publisher directly. The publisher does not serve this page to automated readers, so a direct fetch was not an option here; how we access sources. Archived 2023. Publisher's page: https://www.droit-afrique.com/uploads/Congo-Loi-2020-27-lutte-contre-cybercriminalite.pdf

In force. Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 1 states the Law's object as defining and punishing offences linked to information and communication technology, completing the Penal Code. Article 2 applies the Law to any person, of any nationality, who commits an offence through information and communication technology in the Republic of the Congo.

Article 4 punishes, by six months to three years' imprisonment and a fine of one million to ten million CFA francs, or either penalty, fraudulently accessing or attempting to access all or part of an information system, and separately punishes fraudulently procuring or attempting to procure an advantage by entering a system. Article 5 punishes the same range of penalties for fraudulently remaining or attempting to remain connected to all or part of an information system.

Article 6 punishes, by one to five years' imprisonment and a fine of five million to ten million CFA francs, or either penalty, hindering or attempting to hinder the functioning of an information system. Article 54 separately punishes, by two to five years' imprisonment and a fine of two million to thirty million CFA francs, installing a backdoor to data or an information system without the legitimate user's authorization.

Article 63 punishes, by six months to five years' imprisonment and a fine of four hundred thousand to five million CFA francs, or either penalty, fraudulently copying or attempting to copy computer data to a third party's prejudice. Article 109 provides that the Law is to be published in the Journal Officiel and executed as a law of the State, without stating a separate commencement date.

What it requires

News aggregation law1 instrument, 1 in force

Research summary (200 words)

The Republic of the Congo has no press-publisher neighbouring right and no mandatory platform-to-publisher bargaining code; the general copyright framework of Law No. 24-82 of 7 July 1982 on Copyright and Related Rights is the only law reaching an aggregator's reproduction of news content. Article 14 places news of the day, published, broadcast, or communicated to the public, entirely outside the Law's scope, so a bare news item is never a protected work.

Article 33(1)(b) permits, without the author's consent, inserting quotations of a lawfully published work in another work, including quotations of newspaper articles and periodicals in the form of press reviews, provided the quotation conforms to fair practice, is justified by its purpose, and names the source and author.

Article 33(2) separately permits reproducing, or communicating to the public, a lawfully published newspaper or periodical article on a current economic, political, or religious topic, or a broadcast work of the same character, provided the source is clearly indicated, unless the article or broadcast carried an express reservation against such use at the time of its publication or broadcast.

No reported Congolese decision applies either provision to a systematic online news aggregator as opposed to a conventional press review.

Snippet reproduction

Copyright and Related Rights Law, News and Press-Review Free Uses

Loi n°24-82 du 7 juillet 1982 sur le droit d'auteur et les droits voisins, arts. 14, 33Text of Law No. 24-82 on Copyright and Related Rights, reproduced by liziba.cg

In force. Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 14 excludes laws, judicial and administrative decisions, their official translations, and news of the day published, broadcast, or communicated to the public, from the Law's field of application, so bare news is never a protected work regardless of who first reported it.

Article 33(1)(b) permits, without the author's consent, inserting quotations from a lawfully published work into another work, in the original language or in translation, provided the quotation conforms to fair practice, is limited to what its purpose justifies, and names the source and the author, and the provision expressly extends to quotations of newspaper articles and periodicals in the form of press reviews.

Article 33(2) permits reproducing a lawfully published newspaper or periodical article on a current economic, political, or religious topic, or a broadcast work of the same character, in the press, or communicating it to the public, provided the source is clearly indicated; this use is not licit if the article, at the time of its publication, or the broadcast work, at the time of its broadcast, carried an express reservation that such use is prohibited.

Article 107 provides that the Law is to be executed as a law of the State and published in the Journal Officiel, without stating a separate commencement date.

Note and primary source

This page covers the instruments LexLint has researched to a stage. Instruments named in the corpus but not yet researched are counted in the head and are not listed here. Every entry carries its own primary source on its note page. This is a research index, not legal advice.