Law / Cameroon

Cameroon

All 6 named instruments researched to a stage, across four of the six areas of law we track: 4 in force and 2 enacted but not yet in force. As of 4 September 2026.

  1. AI law none researched
  2. Privacy law 2
  3. Scraping law 2
  4. Cybersecurity law none researched
  5. Age gating law 1
  6. News aggregation law 1

in forceenacted but not yet in forceproposedrepealed, withdrawn or blocked

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page.

Privacy law2 instruments, 1 in force, 1 enacted but not yet in force

Research summary (426 words)

Cameroon's comprehensive personal-data statute is Loi n°2024/017 du 23 décembre 2024 relative à la protection des données à caractère personnel au Cameroun, promulgated on 23 December 2024 and published on the Presidency's own gazette listing; it is Cameroon's first statute specifically dedicated to personal-data protection.

It applies to processing carried out by the State, decentralized territorial authorities, or any other natural or legal person, over the data of any person established, resident, or in transit in Cameroon, and reaches processing carried out abroad wherever Cameroonian law applies under international law or a ratified treaty.

Processing rests on one of a limited set of legal bases including consent, legal obligation, a public-interest mission, and health protection; consent must be free, informed, specific, unequivocal, and express, and processing a minor's data (under 18) additionally needs parental or legal-representative consent.

Sensitive categories, including health data, biometric data, judicial data, religious or political opinions, and banking transactions among others, are in principle prohibited from processing.

The law establishes a prior-authorization regime under which an organization must obtain the data protection authority's authorization before processing, keep a register of processing activities, and notify the authority of a breach without delay, informing affected persons where their rights are threatened; it also creates an independent public data protection authority, whose own organization and functioning is left to a presidential decree not yet issued as of 4 September 2026.

A cross-border transfer of personal data to a foreign country or an international organization needs the authority's prior authorization, conditioned on the destination offering an equivalent level of protection. The law opened an 18-month transitional period from its promulgation for existing processing operations to come into conformity, running to 23 June 2026.

Separately, and predating this comprehensive statute, Loi n°2010/012 du 21 décembre 2010 relative à la cybersécurité et à la cybercriminalité au Cameroun already criminalized a range of personal-data misuse within its own offences chapter: recording or transmitting private or confidential electronic data without the data subject's consent, intercepting personal data in transit between information systems, processing personal data in violation of the prior declaration or authorization formalities that preceded the 2024 law, collecting personal data by unlawful means to harm a person's privacy or reputation, and, at doubled penalties, putting online, storing, or diverting data revealing tribal origin, political or religious opinions, trade-union membership, or morals without the person's express agreement, as well as retaining data in nominative or encrypted form beyond the legal duration stated in the request for opinion or the prior declaration, or disclosing nominative data harming the victim's standing.

Comprehensive regime

Loi n°2024/017 du 23 décembre 2024 relative à la protection des données à caractère personnel au Cameroun

Loi n°2024/017 du 23 décembre 2024Loi n°2024/017 du 23 décembre 2024, Presidency of the Republic of Cameroon gazette listing page

Commencement not set. Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Cameroon's first comprehensive personal-data statute, promulgated on 23 December 2024. It governs processing of personal data by the State, decentralized territorial authorities, and any other natural or legal person. It reaches the data of any person established, resident, or in transit in Cameroon, whether the data controller is established in Cameroon or targets from abroad persons residing in Cameroon.

Processing needs a lawful basis: consent, a legal obligation, a public-interest mission, or health protection. Consent must be free, informed, specific, unequivocal, and express, and processing a minor's data additionally needs parental or legal-representative consent. Sensitive categories including health, biometric, and judicial data, and religious, political, and banking information, are in principle prohibited from processing.

The law requires prior authorization from the data protection authority before processing and a register of processing activities. It also requires breach notification to the authority without delay and to affected persons where their rights are threatened, plus an annual security report. The law creates an independent data protection authority whose organization and functioning is left to a presidential decree not yet issued.

A cross-border transfer needs the authority's prior authorization, conditioned on an equivalent level of protection at the destination. Existing processing operations were given an 18-month transitional period from promulgation, to 23 June 2026, to come into conformity.

What it requires

Enforcement supervision

Loi n°2010/012 du 21 décembre 2010 relative à la cybersécurité et à la cybercriminalité au Cameroun, article 74 (atteinte à la vie privée et traitement illicite des données à caractère personnel)

Loi n°2010/012 du 21 décembre 2010, art. 74Loi n°2010/012 du 21 décembre 2010, official gazetted text hosted by the Agence de Régulation des Télécommunications (ART.cm)

In force since 21 December 2010. Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 74 of Cameroon's cybersecurity and cybercrime law, sitting in the law's own offences-and-sanctions chapter (Title III, Chapter II, Articles 60 to 89), criminalizes a range of personal-data misuse that predates and now sits alongside the 2024 comprehensive statute.

It punishes recording, fixing, or transmitting private or confidential electronic data without the data subject's consent, and intercepting personal data during its transmission between information systems, with one to two years' imprisonment and a fine of 1,000,000 to 5,000,000 FCFA (alinéas 1 and 2).

It separately punishes processing personal data in violation of the prior formalities required before implementation, with one to three years and a fine of 1,000,000 to 5,000,000 FCFA (alinéa 3), and collecting nominative data by unlawful means to harm a person's privacy or standing, with six months to two years and the same fine range (alinéa 4).

Those alinéa-4 penalties are doubled against a person who puts online, keeps, or stores in computerized memory, without the data subject's express agreement, nominative data revealing tribal origin, political or religious opinions, trade-union membership, or morals, and the doubled penalty also reaches a person who diverts such information in the course of recording, filing, or transmitting it (alinéas 5 and 6).

The highest fine in the article, 5,000,000 to 50,000,000 FCFA (with a lower six-months-to-two-years prison term), punishes retaining information in nominative or encrypted form beyond the legal duration stated in the request for opinion or prior declaration for the automated processing, and the same penalty reaches disclosing nominative data in a way that harms the victim's standing (alinéas 7 and 8).

What it requires

Scraping law2 instruments, 2 in force

Research summary (391 words)

Open-web crawling of public pages carries no dedicated Cameroonian statute.

The applicable computer-misuse authority is Loi n°2010/012 du 21 décembre 2010 relative à la cybersécurité et à la cybercriminalité au Cameroun, which criminalizes fraudulently accessing or remaining within all or part of an electronic-communications network or information system while causing a serious disruption or interruption of its functioning (article 68), and separately criminalizes accessing without right and in violation of security measures, all or part of a network, system, or terminal equipment in order to obtain information or data (article 69); no Cameroonian court decision construes how authorization is read for a public, unauthenticated page, and the law's own definition of unlawful access turns on the absence of a right or on a security-measure violation, so it does not by its terms exempt a public page reached without circumventing any technical measure.

No statute or case law addresses terms-of-service enforceability (browsewrap versus clickwrap), or whether login or acceptance of terms changes the legal picture; ordinary contract-formation principles under Cameroon's general civil law would be the applicable general law for a contract-formation question, but this is unsettled rather than a specific regime.

Copyright protects a database only as a compilation, never through a separate sui generis right: Loi n°2000/011 du 19 décembre 2000 relative au droit d'auteur et aux droits voisins defines a database as a collection of works, data, or other elements systematized so as to be searchable and processable by computer, and protects as an original composite work a collection of works, including collections of folklore expressions or of simple facts or data, such as encyclopedias, anthologies, and data compilations, reproduced on a machine-exploitable medium or otherwise, where the selection or arrangement of the material constitutes an original work; the underlying facts and data are not protected as such.

Personal-data reach over scraped public personal data is governed by Loi n°2024/017 du 23 décembre 2024, researched in full under the privacy topic; its scope provisions extend to processing by any natural or legal person over data of a person established, resident, or in transit in Cameroon, without a general publicly-available-data carve-out identified, and processing that reveals a sensitive category, including biometric data, is in principle prohibited.

No specific unfair-competition or misappropriation doctrine addresses scraping, and no case law or regulatory statement gives robots.txt legal weight or addresses AI-training-specific access rules.

Computer misuse

Loi n°2010/012 du 21 décembre 2010 relative à la cybersécurité et à la cybercriminalité au Cameroun, articles 68-69 (accès frauduleux)

Loi n°2010/012 du 21 décembre 2010, art. 68-69Loi n°2010/012 du 21 décembre 2010, official gazetted text hosted by the Agence de Régulation des Télécommunications (ART.cm)

In force since 21 December 2010. Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Cameroon's primary computer-misuse provisions, sitting in the cybersecurity and cybercrime law's offences-and-sanctions chapter.

Article 68 punishes fraudulently accessing or remaining within all or part of an electronic-communications network or information system by transmitting, damaging, or causing a serious disruption or interruption of the system's or network's functioning, with five to ten years' imprisonment and a fine of 10,000,000 to 50,000,000 FCFA, doubled where data is deleted or modified or the system's functioning is altered as a result.

Article 69 punishes accessing without right, and in violation of security measures, all or part of a network, information system, or terminal equipment connected to another information system, in order to obtain information or data, with five to ten years and a fine of 10,000,000 to 100,000,000 FCFA, the highest fine tier in the law's offences chapter.

Neither article carries an exemption for a search engine, indexer, or host, and neither turns its authorization test on whether the page reached was itself publicly accessible; article 69's own text keys liability to a security-measure violation, which a page requiring no authentication and using no technical access control would not appear to trigger, though no reported Cameroonian decision confirms this reading against a scraper of public pages specifically.

What it requires

Database right

Loi n°2000/011 du 19 décembre 2000 relative au droit d'auteur et aux droits voisins, article 4(2)(b) (protection des bases de données)

Loi n°2000/011 du 19 décembre 2000, art. 4(2)(b)Loi n°2000/011 du 19 décembre 2000, official consolidated text, WIPO Lex (WIPO Lex No. CM001)

In force since 19 December 2000. Binds private bodies.

What this law does

Loi n°2000/011 du 19 décembre 2000 relative au droit d'auteur et aux droits voisins defines a "base de données" (article 4, definitions no. 12) as a collection of works, data, or other elements systematized so as to be searchable and processed by computer, and protects, as an original composite work without prejudice to any copyright in the pre-existing work (article 4(2)(b)), collections of works, including collections of folklore expressions or of simple facts or data, such as encyclopedias, anthologies, and data compilations, whether reproduced on a machine-exploitable medium or in any other form, where the selection or arrangement of the material constitutes an original work; there is no separate sui generis database right.

The underlying facts and data within a database remain unprotected; only an original selection or arrangement is a protected work.

Infringement (contrefaçon), defined at article 80 to include any exploitation of a literary or artistic work in violation of the law by representation, reproduction, transformation, or distribution by any means, is punished under article 82 by five to ten years' imprisonment and a fine of 500,000 to 10,000,000 FCFA, or either penalty alone, doubled where the offender is the rightsholder's own co-contracting party.

What it requires

Age gating law1 instrument, 1 enacted but not yet in force

Research summary (239 words)

Cameroon has enacted a broad child-online-protection charter rather than a narrow adult-content-verification or social-media-minor statute. Loi n°2023/009 du 25 juillet 2023 portant charte de protection des enfants en ligne au Cameroun defines a child as any person under 18 (article 3); at 18, a person may validly give online consent and is treated as able to appreciate the deviant or dangerous character of certain content.

The charter brings private-sector actors, internet access providers, content providers, information-system operators, social-network promoters, online-advertising professionals, and audiovisual-communication operators, into the same child-protection duties as public authorities (articles 11 to 14), requiring them to raise awareness among children of ineligible or dangerous sites.

General obligations require these actors to stop indexing content that harms a child's dignity and to report such content to the competent authorities; specific obligations require making available to minor users guides to good practice in cyberspace and to dangerous activities.

Enforcement combines administrative and criminal sanctions: a private actor found in breach is given formal notice by the telecommunications-regulation body to come into compliance within 15 days, and only after that deadline passes unmet can the regulator pronounce administrative sanctions, which are essentially financial; criminal sanctions, defined from article 28 onward, range from fines through imprisonment to prohibitions and temporary closures.

The charter's gazetted text is not publicly available in an accessible form; the provisions described here are as reported by professional legal commentary, and its commencement is not established.

Age-appropriate design code

Loi n°2023/009 du 25 juillet 2023 portant charte de protection des enfants en ligne au Cameroun

Loi n°2023/009 du 25 juillet 2023Loi n°2023/009 du 25 juillet 2023, Presidency of the Republic of Cameroon gazette listing page

Commencement not set. Binds private bodies.

What this law does

Cameroon's charter for the protection of children online was adopted 25 July 2023. The charter defines a child as any person under 18 (article 3). It places internet access providers, content providers, information-system operators, social-network promoters, online-advertising professionals, and audiovisual-communication operators under the same child-protection duties as public authorities (articles 11 to 14).

A general duty requires these actors to stop indexing content that harms a child's dignity and to report it to the competent authorities, and a specific duty requires making available to minor users guides to good practice in cyberspace and to dangerous activities. A private actor in breach is first given formal notice by the body regulating telecommunications to come into compliance within 15 days.

Only after that deadline passes unmet may the regulator pronounce administrative sanctions, which are essentially financial, while criminal sanctions range from fines through imprisonment to professional prohibitions and temporary closures. Criminal sanctions are defined from article 28 onward.

Note and primary source

News aggregation law1 instrument, 1 in force

Research summary (397 words)

Cameroon has no press-publisher neighbouring right, no mandatory platform-to-publisher bargaining code, no recognized hot-news misappropriation doctrine distinct from ordinary copyright law, and no statute or case law addressing hyperlinking or framing liability specifically; each of those dimensions is a sourced absence rather than an unresolved question.

The relevant instrument is Loi n°2000/011 du 19 décembre 2000 relative au droit d'auteur et aux droits voisins, whose neighbouring-rights provisions protect only performers, producers of sound and video recordings, and audiovisual-communication enterprises, not print or online news publishers, so there is no publisher-side neighbouring right of the kind the European Union's Digital Single Market Directive article 15 creates.

The law permits, once a work has been published with the author's authorization, analyses, press reviews, and short quotations justified by the critical, pedagogical, scientific, or informational character of the work, provided they carry the mention "source" and the author's name where it appears in the source (article 29(1)(d)); it separately permits reproducing and making accessible to the public, for informational purposes and in short excerpts, literary or artistic works seen, heard, or recorded in the course of a current event, by photography, broadcast, or other means of public communication, on the occasion of a report on that event (article 30).

It further permits the press or a broadcaster to reproduce, in the original or in translation, political, social, economic, or religious current-affairs articles, political speeches, and speeches delivered in judicial proceedings, sermons, conferences, and addresses, unless the right of exploitation has been expressly reserved, always subject to clearly indicating the source and the author's name (article 31); this express-reservation proviso functions as an author-side opt-out for that specific exception, the closest Cameroonian law comes to a machine-readable reservation mechanism, though it long predates the concept of one and is not framed as machine-readable.

None of these exceptions is capped at a headline-length or short-extract threshold in the way some jurisdictions' quotation rights are, the article 31 exception is not confined to the press industry, and no reported Cameroonian decision applies any of these provisions to a systematic news aggregator as opposed to a traditional newspaper or broadcaster.

The law predates the concept of a machine-readable text-and-data-mining reservation, so no opt-out mechanism of that kind exists, and no statute or case law addresses whether a hyperlink is itself a communication to the public, or whether framing or inline display changes the answer.

Snippet reproduction

Loi n°2000/011 du 19 décembre 2000 relative au droit d'auteur et aux droits voisins, articles 29, 30, 31 (revue de presse, actualité, citation)

Loi n°2000/011 du 19 décembre 2000, art. 29, 30, 31Loi n°2000/011 du 19 décembre 2000, official consolidated text, WIPO Lex (WIPO Lex No. CM001)

In force since 19 December 2000. Binds private bodies.

What this law does

Loi n°2000/011 du 19 décembre 2000 relative au droit d'auteur et aux droits voisins permits, once a work has been published with the author's authorization, analyses, press reviews, and short quotations justified by the critical, pedagogical, scientific, or informational character of the work, provided the source and the author's name (where it appears in the source) are indicated (article 29(1)(d)).

It separately permits reproducing and making accessible to the public, for informational purposes and in short excerpts, literary or artistic works seen, heard, or recorded in the course of a current event, by photography, broadcast, or another means of public communication, on the occasion of reporting that event (article 30).

It further permits the press or a broadcaster to reproduce, in original version or in translation, political, social, economic, or religious current-affairs articles, political speeches, speeches delivered in judicial proceedings, and sermons, conferences, and addresses of the same nature, unless the right of exploitation has been expressly reserved by the author or the copyright owner, always subject to clearly indicating the source and the author's name (article 31).

Neighbouring rights under the law protect only performers, producers of sound and video recordings, and audiovisual-communication enterprises, so a print or online news publisher holds no neighbouring right distinct from its ordinary copyright in the articles it publishes. No provision addresses hyperlinking, framing, or inline display, and no reported case law applies articles 29, 30, or 31 to a systematic aggregator rather than a traditional press or broadcast outlet.

Note and primary source

This page covers the instruments LexLint has researched to a stage. Instruments named in the corpus but not yet researched are counted in the head and are not listed here. Every entry carries its own primary source on its note page. This is a research index, not legal advice.