Law / Algeria

Algeria

All 5 named instruments researched to a stage, across three of the six areas of law we track: 5 in force. As of 4 September 2026.

When they take effect5 of 5 carry a date. Earlier is before 2014.
Before 2014: 4 instruments (4 in force) earlier 2014: 0 instruments 2015: 0 instruments ’15 2016: 0 instruments 2017: 0 instruments 2018: 0 instruments 2019: 0 instruments 2020: 0 instruments ’20 2021: 0 instruments 2022: 0 instruments 2023: 1 instrument (1 in force) 2024: 0 instruments 2025: 0 instruments 2026: 0 instruments ’26 today

in forceenacted but not yet in forceproposedrepealed, withdrawn or blocked

  1. AI law none researched
  2. Privacy law 1
  3. Scraping law 3
  4. Cybersecurity law none researched
  5. Age gating law none researched
  6. News aggregation law 1

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page.

Privacy law1 instrument, 1 in force

Research summary (253 words)

Algeria's comprehensive personal-data statute is Loi n° 18-07 du 10 juin 2018 relative à la protection des personnes physiques dans le traitement des données à caractère personnel, published in the Journal officiel n° 34 of 10 June 2018 and amended and supplemented by Loi n° 25-11 du 24 juillet 2025, published in Journal officiel n° 48.

The 2018 law's own transitional clause ties full applicability to the installation of the Autorité nationale de protection des données à caractère personnel (ANPDP), which existing data controllers had one year to comply with from that date; Algeria's official state news agency reported the ANPDP's president and members installed on 11 August 2022, which would place the compliance deadline at 11 August 2023; the installation date is as reported by the state press agency.

The 2025 amendment adds a mandatory data protection officer, a restriction on decisions based solely on automated processing, a formal data protection impact assessment duty for high-risk processing, a five-day breach notification deadline to the ANPDP, and a defined category of biometric data carrying heightened security duties, while leaving the 2018 law's sensitive-data category (racial or ethnic origin, political opinions, religious or philosophical convictions, trade-union membership, and health data including genetic data) unchanged.

Enforcement combines administrative measures and fines set by the ANPDP with criminal offences carrying imprisonment and fines that vary by the provision breached, and the holder of a right under the law who claims to be harmed by its infringement may seek protective measures or reparation from the competent court.

Comprehensive regime

Loi n° 18-07 relative à la protection des personnes physiques dans le traitement des données à caractère personnel, modifiée et complétée par la loi n° 25-11

Loi n° 18-07 du 10 juin 2018 Journal officiel n° 34, telle que modifiée et complétée par la loi n° 25-11 du 24 juillet 2025, Journal officiel n° 48Loi n° 18-07 du 10 juin 2018 and loi n° 25-11 du 24 juillet 2025, Journal officiel de la République algérienne

In force since 11 August 2023. Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Loi n° 18-07 sets Algeria's general rules for processing personal data of a natural person, binding both public bodies and private persons, whether the processing is automated or held in a manual filing system, and reaching a controller established outside Algeria that uses processing means located in Algeria.

Existing data controllers had one year from the installation of the Autorité nationale de protection des données à caractère personnel (ANPDP) to comply, which Algeria's state press agency reported took place on 11 August 2022, placing that compliance deadline on 11 August 2023.

Processing sensitive data (racial or ethnic origin, political opinions, religious or philosophical convictions, trade-union membership, or health data including genetic data) is prohibited unless a listed exception applies, such as the data subject's express consent or data the data subject has manifestly made public. A data subject has rights to information, access, rectification, and opposition, and a transfer of personal data to a foreign state needs the ANPDP's prior authorization.

Loi n° 25-11 of 24 July 2025 adds a mandatory data protection officer, a right against a judicial or other legally significant decision based solely on automated processing evaluating aspects of a person's personality, a data protection impact assessment duty for processing likely to create a high risk, a five-day breach notification deadline to the ANPDP, heightened security duties specifically for sensitive and biometric data, and a defined biometric-data category.

What it requires

Scraping law3 instruments, 3 in force

Research summary (245 words)

Algeria's computer-misuse authority sits in the Penal Code (ordonnance n° 66-156 du 8 juin 1966), articles 394 bis to 394 noniès, inserted by loi n° 04-15 du 10 novembre 2004: fraudulently accessing or remaining in an automated data-processing system is an offence whether or not the system is behind a technical protection measure, so a public, unauthenticated page is not carved out by the text.

Loi n° 09-04 du 5 août 2009 supplies the investigative and procedural framework around the same offences, including obligations on internet service providers to remove or block illicit content and to cooperate with judicial authorities, with its own penalty for a provider's non-compliance. No statute or reported case addresses terms-of-service enforceability, or whether login or acceptance of terms changes the legal picture; this is unsettled rather than a specific regime.

Copyright protects a database only as a compilation, never through a separate sui generis right: ordonnance n° 03-05 du 19 juillet 2003 protects a collection of works or data as an original creation only where the choice or arrangement of its contents is itself original, and its private-use exception expressly excludes the digital-form reproduction of a database.

The same ordinance's quotation exception permits a citation or borrowing from a work in another work where it conforms to loyal use for information or demonstration and names the author and source. No text-and-data-mining exception, and no AI-training-specific rule, is in force, and robots.txt carries no statutory weight one way or the other.

Computer misuse

Code pénal, atteintes aux systèmes de traitement automatisé de données

Ordonnance n° 66-156 du 8 juin 1966 portant code pénal articles 394 bis à 394 noniès, insérés par la loi n° 04-15 du 10 novembre 2004 (JO n° 71)Code pénal (ordonnance n° 66-156 du 8 juin 1966), consolidated text through loi n° 14-01 du 4 février 2014, WIPO Lex

In force since 10 November 2004. Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Articles 394 bis to 394 noniès of the Penal Code punish fraudulently accessing or remaining in all or part of an automated data-processing system with three months to one year of imprisonment and a fine of 50,000 to 100,000 DA, doubled where data is suppressed or modified, and raised to six months to two years and 50,000 to 150,000 DA where the system's operation is altered (art. 394 bis).

Fraudulently introducing, deleting, or modifying data in such a system carries six months to three years and 500,000 to 2,000,000 DA (art. 394 ter). Creating, researching, assembling, distributing, or marketing tools or data by which these offences can be committed, or possessing, revealing, or using data obtained through them, carries two months to three years and 1,000,000 to 5,000,000 DA (art. 394 quater).

Penalties double where the offence harms national defense or a public-law body (art. 394 quinquiès), a legal person is fined up to five times the maximum fine for a natural person (art. 394 sixiès), and participating in a group or agreement formed to prepare one or more of these offences is punished the same as the completed offence (art. 394 septiès), attempt likewise (art. 394 noniès), and art. 394 octiès provides for confiscation of the instruments and data used and closure of the site or premises involved.

What it requires

Loi n° 09-04 relative à la prévention et à la lutte contre les infractions liées aux technologies de l'information et de la communication

Loi n° 09-04 du 5 août 2009 portant règles particulières relatives à la prévention et à la lutte contre les infractions liées aux… technologies de l'information et de la communication, Journal officiel n° 47Loi n° 09-04 du 5 août 2009, Journal officiel de la République algérienne n° 47

In force since 5 August 2009. Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Loi n° 09-04 defines an ICT-related offence by reference to the Penal Code's automated-data-processing-system offences and any other offence committed or facilitated through a computer or electronic communications system, and sets the procedure for judicially-authorized electronic surveillance of communications in terrorism, state security, and serious computer-system-threat investigations.

Internet access providers must remove or block access to illicit content as soon as they become aware of it, directly or indirectly, and assist the competent judicial authorities; a provider's failure to comply carries six months to five years' imprisonment and a fine of 50,000 to 500,000 DA for the natural person responsible. Data gathered through surveillance may be used only for the investigation it was gathered for.

This law's obligations bind service and access providers, not a web crawler generally: art. 2(d) defines a 'fournisseur de services' as an entity offering users the means to communicate over a computer or telecommunications system, or an entity processing or storing data for that communication service or its users, which does not on its own reach an operator that only collects data from public pages it does not own.

What it requires

Database right

Ordonnance n° 03-05, protection des bases de données

Ordonnance n° 03-05 du 19 juillet 2003, art. 5 (bases de données)Ordonnance n° 03-05 du 19 juillet 2003 relative aux droits d'auteur et aux droits voisins

In force since 19 July 2003. Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Ordonnance n° 03-05 relative aux droits d'auteur et aux droits voisins protects a database as an original composite work only where the choice or arrangement of its contents constitutes an original creation, the same standard it applies to a collection or anthology of works; Algeria has no separate sui generis database right. Its private-use exception, which otherwise allows a single copy for personal or family use, expressly excludes the digital-form reproduction of a database. Reproducing or communicating a protected work or database without authorization is punishable as contrefaçon.

What it requires

News aggregation law1 instrument, 1 in force

Research summary (149 words)

Algeria has no press-publisher neighbouring right and no compelled platform-to-publisher bargaining regime; the general copyright framework of ordonnance n° 03-05 du 19 juillet 2003 relative aux droits d'auteur et aux droits voisins is the only law reaching an aggregator's reproduction of news content.

Its quotation exception permits citing or borrowing from a work in another work where the use conforms to loyal use for information or demonstration and the author and source are named, which reaches a short excerpt or headline used this way but not a systematic or wholesale reproduction. No reported case or statute addresses hyperlinking or framing specifically, and no text-and-data-mining exception or machine-readable opt-out mechanism is in force; the ordinance predates that concept.

A database of headlines or articles is protected only as an original compilation, never through a separate sui generis right, so an unoriginal, purely factual aggregation is not itself protected against reproduction.

Snippet reproduction

Ordonnance n° 03-05, exception de citation

Ordonnance n° 03-05 du 19 juillet 2003, art. 41-42 (citations)Ordonnance n° 03-05 du 19 juillet 2003 relative aux droits d'auteur et aux droits voisins

In force since 19 July 2003. Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

A citation or borrowing from a published work in another work is licit under ordonnance n° 03-05 where it conforms to loyal use for information or demonstration purposes, provided the author's name and the source are always given. A single-copy private reproduction of a work is otherwise licit for personal or family use, but that exception does not cover a digital-form database reproduction.

Reproducing or communicating a protected work without authorization outside these exceptions is punishable as contrefaçon.

Note and primary source

This page covers the instruments LexLint has researched to a stage. Instruments named in the corpus but not yet researched are counted in the head and are not listed here. Every entry carries its own primary source on its note page. This is a research index, not legal advice.