Law / Eritrea

Eritrea

All 4 named instruments researched to a stage, across three of the six areas of law we track: 4 enacted but not yet in force. As of 7 September 2026.

  1. AI law none researched
  2. Privacy law 2
  3. Scraping law 1
  4. Cybersecurity law none researched
  5. Age gating law none researched
  6. News aggregation law 1

in forceenacted but not yet in forceproposedrepealed, withdrawn or blocked

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page.

Privacy law2 instruments, 2 enacted but not yet in force

Research summary (213 words)

Eritrea has no comprehensive data-protection statute and no dedicated data-protection supervisory authority.

Personal-data protection rests instead on two narrower instruments: the Civil Code of the State of Eritrea (2015) gives a person a civil claim against the unauthorized exhibition, reproduction, or sale of their photograph or image, and makes the contents of a confidential letter or other communication addressed to another person inviolable without that addressee's consent; and the Penal Code of the State of Eritrea (2015) makes it a criminal offence to intercept, open, or otherwise interfere with a telephone call, letter, electronic message, or other private communication addressed to another person, without lawful authority.

Both codes were issued by the Ministry of Justice on 15 May 2015; neither code's own text states a Gazette-publication or commencement date, and a legal-research guide (GlobaLex, New York University School of Law) describes the Government of Eritrea as having announced the enactment of the 2015 codes while the Transitional Civil Code and Transitional Penal Code of 1991, themselves derived from the 1960s Ethiopian codes, remain described as the primary source of law.

Neither code establishes a lawful-basis or purpose-limitation framework, a controller or processor duty, a data-subject access or deletion right, a cross-border transfer restriction, or a breach-notification duty, and Eritrea has no biometric-specific statute.

Comprehensive regime

Civil Code of the State of Eritrea, Personality Rights (Image and Correspondence)

Civil Code of the State of Eritrea (2015), arts. 26-30 (Image and Privacy; Inviolability of Correspondence)Civil Code of the State of Eritrea (2015), official English text hosted by WIPO Lex

Commencement not set. Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 26 provides that the photograph or image of a person may not be exhibited in a public place, reproduced, or offered for sale without that person's consent. Article 27 excuses the consent requirement where the reproduction is justified by the person's notoriety, the public office they held, the requirements of justice or the police, a scientific, cultural, or didactic interest, or where the image concerns facts, events, or ceremonies of public interest or that took place in public.

Article 28 lets the person demand that an unauthorized exhibition or offer for sale be stopped, and lets the Court award damages, capped at the enrichment the user derived, with moral-prejudice damages available if the use does not stop once demanded.

Article 30 makes the contents of a confidential letter, electronic message, or other private communication inviolable: the addressee may not divulge its contents without the author's consent, though the addressee may produce it in judicial proceedings on a showing of a legitimate interest.

The Civil Code was issued by the Ministry of Justice on 15 May 2015; the source read does not state a Gazette-publication or commencement date, and a legal-research guide describes the 2015 codes' entry into force as unclear as against the still-cited Transitional Civil Code of 1991.

What it requires

Enforcement supervision

Penal Code of the State of Eritrea, Violation of Privacy

Penal Code of the State of Eritrea (2015), art. 298 (Violation of Privacy)Penal Code of the State of Eritrea (2015)

Commencement not set. Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 298(1) makes it an offence to intentionally, and without lawful authority, intercept, open, or otherwise interfere with a telephone call, letter, electronic message, or other private communication addressed to another person, or, having learned facts by mistakenly opening a communication not addressed to oneself, to divulge those facts or profit from them.

Violation of privacy is a Class 2 petty offence, punishable with imprisonment of 1 to 6 months or a fine of 5,001 to 20,000 Nakfas, set in intervals of 1,000 Nakfas. Article 298(2) makes prosecution conditional on the victim preferring charges. Article 3 of the Penal Code ties the Code's own entry into force to its publication in the Gazette of Eritrean Laws; the Code's own text does not state that Gazette date and carries no proclamation number of its own.

What it requires

Scraping law1 instrument, 1 enacted but not yet in force

Research summary (216 words)

Eritrea has no scraping-specific statute, so general law governs each dimension separately.

The Penal Code of the State of Eritrea (2015) criminalizes unauthorized use of a computer, including obtaining an unauthorized computer service, intercepting a function of a computer system, or altering, destroying, or interfering with data, but the base offence's own heading and its first paragraph tie the conduct to an unauthorized computer service, so a scraper that reads a public, unauthenticated page without defeating any access control falls outside a plain reading of the provision; no reported Eritrean case has tested the point.

Eritrea has no reported court decision construing the enforceability of a browsewrap or clickwrap terms-of-service against a scraper. The Civil Code of the State of Eritrea (2015) gives an author an incorporeal ownership right in a work of the mind and no text-and-data-mining exception, but Eritrea has not enacted a copyright statute conferring a sui generis database right, and its related-rights provisions do not reach a compiled database as such.

Eritrea has no comprehensive data-protection statute; the personal-data protections that exist are described under the privacy topic. No statute or reported case establishes a scraping-specific unfair-competition, misappropriation, or trespass doctrine, and neither the Penal Code nor the Civil Code assigns legal weight to a robots.txt directive or states an AI-training-specific rule.

Computer misuse

Penal Code of the State of Eritrea, Unauthorized Use of a Computer

Penal Code of the State of Eritrea (2015), arts. 374-375 (Unauthorized Use of a Computer)Penal Code of the State of Eritrea (2015)

Commencement not set. Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 374(1) makes it an offence for a person to intentionally obtain, directly or indirectly, any unauthorized computer service; intercept, by an electro-magnetic, acoustic, mechanical, or other device, any function of a computer system; alter or destroy data in a computer, render data meaningless, useless, or ineffective, or obstruct, interrupt, or interfere with the lawful use of data; or permit another person access to a computer password enabling such an offence, or otherwise deny or interfere with an entitled person's access to data.

Unauthorized use of a computer is a Class 2 petty offence, punishable with imprisonment of 1 to 6 months or a fine of 5,001 to 20,000 Nakfas, set in intervals of 1,000 Nakfas. Article 375 makes the same conduct against a public or financial institution a Class 8 serious offence, aggravated unauthorized use, punishable with imprisonment of 3 to 5 years, with no fine stated.

Because the offence's own heading and article 374(1)(a) tie the conduct to an unauthorized computer service, a scraper reading a public, unauthenticated page without defeating any access control falls outside a plain reading of the provision; the Council of Europe's Octopus Cybercrime Community country profile for Eritrea describes this Penal Code as the jurisdiction's substantive law on illegal access, illegal interception, and data interference, and does not identify any separate cybercrime statute.

What it requires

News aggregation law1 instrument, 1 enacted but not yet in force

Research summary (211 words)

Eritrea has no press-publisher neighbouring right, no mandatory platform-to-publisher bargaining code, no recognized hot-news or misappropriation doctrine distinct from ordinary copyright law, and no located statute or case law on hyperlinking or framing.

The Civil Code of the State of Eritrea (2015), Title IV, Chapter 1 (Copyright), lets a newspaper or review reproduce articles of topical interest in the press unless reproduction was expressly reserved, with the source always stated, and lets daily news articles that are mere press information be freely reproduced; it separately lets a person quote from a lawfully communicated work, including quotations from newspaper, weekly, or periodical articles in the form of press reviews, where the quotation conforms to social custom and its extent is justified by its purpose, with no fixed length cap. The Code predates the concept of a machine-readable text-and-data-mining reservation, so no opt-out mechanism of that kind exists.

The 2015 Civil Code was issued by the Ministry of Justice on 15 May 2015 and, per a corrected translation held by WIPO Lex, renumbered the copyright articles that a repealed 1993 extract of the Provisional Civil Code had carried at articles 1647-1674; whether the 2015 Code has itself entered into force, as against the still-cited Transitional Civil Code of 1991, has not been confirmed.

Snippet reproduction

Civil Code of the State of Eritrea, Copyright, Press and Quotation Exceptions

Civil Code of the State of Eritrea (2015), Title IV, Chapter 1, arts. 1157-1174 (Copyright)Civil Code of the State of Eritrea (2015), official English text hosted by WIPO Lex

Commencement not set. Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 1157 gives the author of a work of the mind an incorporeal property right by the mere fact of its creation, and article 1158 lists literary, musical, figurative, and other works, including computer programs, as works of the mind.

Article 1168 lets articles of topical interest published in newspapers and reviews be reproduced in the press, whether printed or broadcast, unless the reproduction was expressly reserved, on condition the source is always clearly stated, and lets daily news articles on current events that are mere press information be freely reproduced; it also allows including a work in a short recording, showing, or announcement of it in a photographic, film, radio, or television report of current affairs.

Article 1169 lets the press freely reproduce speeches delivered in political assemblies, public meetings, or official ceremonies for fifteen days after they were made. Article 1171 provides that the author cannot forbid analyses and press reviews of the work.

Article 1172 provides that the author cannot forbid quotations from a lawfully communicated work where the quotation conforms to what may reasonably be accepted by social custom and the number and length of the passages quoted are justified by the purpose to be achieved, and states expressly that quotations include quotations from articles appearing in daily or weekly newspapers, weeklies, or other periodicals in the form of press reviews, with no fixed length or headline cap and not confined to short extracts.

Article 1161 excludes official legislative, administrative, or judicial texts from copyright protection and lets them be freely reproduced. The 2015 Civil Code renumbered the copyright articles that a repealed 1993 extract of the Provisional Civil Code had carried at articles 1647-1674.

Note and primary source

This page covers the instruments LexLint has researched to a stage. Instruments named in the corpus but not yet researched are counted in the head and are not listed here. Every entry carries its own primary source on its note page. This is a research index, not legal advice.