Guyana has no scraping-specific statute, so general law governs each dimension separately. The Cybercrime Act, 2018 (Act No. 16 of 2018) criminalises illegal access to a computer system among a wider set of offences (illegal interception, illegal data interference, illegal system interference, and misuse of devices); how Guyanese courts would read authorisation for a public, unauthenticated page is not settled, and no reported Guyanese case on the point has been located.
No Guyanese court has ruled on the enforceability of a browsewrap or clickwrap terms-of-service against a scraper. Guyana has no domestic copyright statute; the applicable copyright law is the United Kingdom's Copyright Act 1956, extended with modifications by the Copyright (British Guiana) Order 1966, which predates the concept of a text-and-data-mining exception, so no such exception or machine-readable opt-out exists, and the Act confers no sui generis database right.
Guyana enacted a comprehensive personal-data statute, the Data Protection Act 2023 (Act No. 18 of 2023), but as of the date below no commencement order has brought it into force, so scraped personal data in Guyana is not currently subject to a comprehensive privacy-law overlay; see the privacy topic's Guyana document for that instrument.
No Guyanese statute or reported case establishes a scraping-specific unfair-competition, misappropriation, or trespass doctrine, and none assigns legal weight to a robots.txt directive or imposes an AI-training-specific rule.