Law / Kiribati

Kiribati

3 of 5 named instruments researched to a stage, across three of the six areas of law we track: 3 enacted but not yet in force. As of 13 September 2026.

  1. AI law none researched
  2. Privacy law 1
  3. Scraping law 1
  4. Cybersecurity law none researched
  5. Age gating law none researched
  6. News aggregation law 1

in forceenacted but not yet in forceproposedrepealed, withdrawn or blocked

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page.

Privacy law1 instrument, 1 enacted but not yet in force

Research summary (150 words)

Kiribati's first comprehensive data-protection statute, the Data Protection Act 2025, has been made by the Maneaba ni Maungatabu and assented to by the Beretitenti, and is not yet in force: section 2 provides that it commences on a date the Minister may appoint by notice, and no appointing notice was located as of this review.

It creates lawful-basis, purpose-limitation, data-subject-rights, breach-notification, cross-border-transfer and enforcement duties administered by the Digital Transformation Office, modelled on the privacy laws of Australia and New Zealand. None of those duties binds anyone until commencement, and section 6(2) then defers application for a further two years for a person who is not a controller of major importance.

The Digital Government Act 2023, which does bind Kiribati's public bodies and their digital infrastructure, defines no personal-data duties of its own; section 34 of the new Act amends it to cross-reference the new rules, on the same commencement.

Comprehensive regime

Data Protection Act 2025

Data Protection Act 2025Act text as published by the Ministry of Information

Commencement not set. Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

The Act requires a controller to process personal data only on one of twelve specified lawful bases, including consent, contract necessity, legal obligation, and legitimate interests, and only for a purpose that is explicit and compatible with the purpose for which the data was collected.

It grants a data subject the right to confirm, access, correct, and delete their personal data, to withdraw consent, and not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing that produces a legal or similarly significant effect, subject to listed exceptions.

It requires a controller to notify the Digital Transformation Office and each affected data subject of a personal data breach likely to result in significant harm, and to take reasonable steps to verify adequate protection before processing or transferring personal data outside Kiribati. Processing the personal data of a person under eighteen requires the consent of a parent, guardian, or other legal representative, subject to listed exceptions.

Section 5(3) states that the Act binds the Republic. The Bill passed its first reading unanimously in the Maneaba ni Maungatabu on 1 April 2025. The Act print the Ministry now publishes reads “An Act entitled” and “MADE by the Maneaba ni Maungatabu and assented to by the Beretitenti”, with the assent date and act number left blank on the print, so no assent date is recorded here.

Section 2 leaves commencement to a notice the Minister may appoint, and none was located, so nothing in the Act binds anyone yet.

What it requires

Scraping law1 instrument, 1 enacted but not yet in force

Research summary (285 words)

Kiribati has no scraping-specific statute, so general law governs each dimension separately.

The Cybercrime Act 2021 criminalises unauthorised access to a computer system in broader terms than several neighbouring jurisdictions: section 7 makes access illegal or unauthorised whenever the accessing person is not entitled to control access of that kind and has not obtained the consent of a person who is so entitled, without requiring that the accessor infringe a technical security measure, so a plain reading does not rule out liability for reading a public, unauthenticated page if the site's operator can be shown not to have consented to that kind of access; no reported Kiribati case has tested the point either way.

No Kiribati court has ruled on the enforceability of a browsewrap or clickwrap terms-of-service against a scraper.

The Copyright Act 2018 lists exceptions to copyright infringement for quoting from a work and for copying to report current events to the public, among others, but the operative text of those exceptions is not reproduced in the available copies of the Act, so their specific conditions are not established here; Kiribati has not enacted a text-and-data-mining exception, and its copyright statute confers no sui generis database right, its neighbouring rights covering only performers, producers of sound recordings, and broadcasters.

The Data Protection Act 2025, which would apply Kiribati's first personal-data lawful-basis and purpose-limitation duties to scraped personal data, has passed only a first reading in Parliament and is not yet law, so no privacy-law duty currently reaches personal data scraped from a public Kiribati website.

No Kiribati statute or reported case establishes a scraping-specific unfair-competition, misappropriation, or trespass doctrine, and none assigns legal weight to a robots.txt directive or imposes an AI-training-specific rule.

Computer misuse

Cybercrime Act 2021, unauthorised access

Cybercrime Act 2021 (No. 10 of 2021), s. 7 (Unauthorised access)Official Act text published by the Ministry of Information, Communications and Transport

Commencement not set. Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Section 7 makes access of any kind to a computer program or computer data held in a computer system illegal or unauthorised if the accessing person is not entitled to control access of that kind and does not have the consent of a person who is so entitled. A person who knowingly, or recklessly and without authority, causes a computer system to perform a function to secure such access is liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $10,000 or imprisonment not exceeding 7 years, or both.

The Act applies to an act or omission in Kiribati's territory, on a Kiribati-registered ship or aircraft, or to a Kiribati national's conduct outside Kiribati where that conduct would also be an offence where it occurred. A Cybercrime Unit within the Kiribati Police Service administers the Act. The Act was assented to by the Beretitenti and states that it commences on a date the Minister appoints by notice; no commencement notice has been located.

What it requires

News aggregation law1 instrument, 1 enacted but not yet in force

Research summary (180 words)

Kiribati has no press-publisher neighbouring right and no mandatory platform-to-publisher bargaining code; the general copyright framework of the Copyright Act 2018 is the only law reaching an aggregator's reproduction of news content.

Its arrangement of sections names an exception to copyright infringement titled 'Quoting from work' at section 16, among several others running from sections 14 to 21, but the operative text of those sections is not reproduced in the available copies of the Act, so their specific conditions are not established here.

Neighbouring rights under Part III of the Act protect performers, producers of sound recordings, and broadcasters, not print or online news publishers, so there is no publisher-side neighbouring right of the kind the European Union's Digital Single Market Directive Article 15 creates.

No statute or case law addresses whether a hyperlink is itself a communication to the public, or whether framing or inline display changes the answer, and no hot-news or misappropriation doctrine distinct from ordinary copyright law exists. The Act predates the concept of a machine-readable text-and-data-mining reservation, so no opt-out mechanism of that kind exists.

This page covers the instruments LexLint has researched to a stage. Instruments named in the corpus but not yet researched are counted in the head and are not listed here. Every entry carries its own primary source on its note page. This is a research index, not legal advice.