Law / Korea (North)

Korea (North)

All 4 named instruments researched to a stage, across two of the six areas of law we track: 4 in force. As of 7 September 2026.

  1. AI law none researched
  2. Privacy law none researched
  3. Scraping law 3
  4. Cybersecurity law none researched
  5. Age gating law none researched
  6. News aggregation law 1

in forceenacted but not yet in forceproposedrepealed, withdrawn or blocked

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page.

Scraping law3 instruments, 3 in force

Research summary (248 words)

North Korea has no scraping-specific statute, so general law governs each dimension separately.

The Copyright Law of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (2001, amended 2006) lists computer programs among the objects of copyright and permits use of a copyrighted work without the holder's permission only in nine listed cases (personal or family use, library or archive preservation, school education, state management, press introduction, quotation, free performance, public-place copying, and Braille or sound recording for the blind); none of the nine is framed as a machine-readable reservation or a text-and-data-mining opt-out, so no exception of that kind exists.

The Law on the Protection of Computer Software (2003) separately prohibits destroying or removing a technological protection device on registered software without the copyright holder's permission, and names destruction of or illegal access to a software through a computer network among the acts its supervisory organs control.

The Criminal Code, as amended through April 2009, criminalises intruding into a computer network in the fields of state administration, national defence, or advanced science and technology, a narrow, sector-limited offence rather than a general unauthorised-access law reaching an ordinary public website, and separately criminalises destroying important information held on a computer and inputting or spreading false information through a computer network.

No statute or reported decision addresses terms-of-service enforceability, a sui generis database right, an unfair-competition or trespass doctrine for scraping, or the legal weight of a robots.txt directive; personal-data protection for this jurisdiction is addressed in the privacy topic's own document.

Computer misuse

Criminal Code, Computer and Information Offences

Criminal Code, Computer and Information Offences, Arts. 201-203 (amended up to April 2009)Original Korean text of the Criminal Code of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, as amended up to April 2009, WIPO Lex

In force. Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 201 (Crime of Computer Network Intrusion) punishes with up to 2 years of labour-reform a person who intrudes into a computer network in the fields of state administration, national defence construction, or advanced science and technology, a narrow, sector-limited offence rather than a general unauthorised-access law reaching an ordinary public website.

Article 202 (Crime of Information Destruction) punishes with up to 3 years of labour-reform a person who destroys important information stored in an information-processing device such as a computer. Article 203 (Crime of Inputting or Spreading False Information) punishes with up to 2 years of labour-reform a person who, under greed, jealousy, or another base motive, inputs false information into a computer network or spreads it, causing confusion in information processing.

None of the three articles carries a monetary fine; the sanction is a term of the Code's own labour-training or labour-reform, not a penalty this dataset's schema expresses as a monetary cap.

What it requires

Law on the Protection of Computer Software, Prohibited Acts and Supervision

Law on the Protection of Computer Software, Arts. 34 and 39, 2003Official English translation of the Law of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea on the Protection of Computer Software, WIPO Lex

In force. Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 34 prohibits, without the copyright holder's permission, using, copying, exhibiting, circulating, adapting, translating, selling, or telecasting a software, altering the name of its developer or of the software, exporting or importing it, or destroying or removing a protection device of its software technology.

Article 39 places destruction of or illegal access to a software through computer networks among the acts the central guidance organ of software industry and the relevant supervisory and control organ must control, alongside producing, copying, or circulating a computer virus.

Article 35 permits copying and using a software without permission only where it is used for educational purposes in educational institutions, needed for a law-enforcement organ's investigation of a case, or has been distributed free of charge.

What it requires

News aggregation law1 instrument, 1 in force

Research summary (155 words)

North Korea has no press-publisher neighbouring right, no compelled platform-to-publisher bargaining regime, no recognised hot-news or misappropriation doctrine distinct from ordinary copyright law, and no located statute or case law on hyperlinking or framed display.

The Copyright Law of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (2001, amended 2006) excludes documents for state management, current news, or information data from copyright protection outright unless a commercial purpose is pursued (Art. 12), and separately lets any person broadcast or carry a copyrighted work in a newspaper or periodical for the purpose of introducing it, or quote a copyrighted work, without the copyright holder's permission (Art. 32(5) and (6)).

Neither provision is capped at a headline-length or short-extract threshold, and no reported North Korean decision applies either to a systematic news aggregator as opposed to a traditional press report. The Law predates the concept of a machine-readable text-and-data-mining reservation entirely, so no opt-out mechanism of that kind exists.

This page covers the instruments LexLint has researched to a stage. Instruments named in the corpus but not yet researched are counted in the head and are not listed here. Every entry carries its own primary source on its note page. This is a research index, not legal advice.