Law / Libya

Libya

All 4 named instruments researched to a stage, across three of the six areas of law we track: 4 in force. As of 5 September 2026.

  1. AI law none researched
  2. Privacy law 1
  3. Scraping law 2
  4. Cybersecurity law none researched
  5. Age gating law none researched
  6. News aggregation law 1

in forceenacted but not yet in forceproposedrepealed, withdrawn or blocked

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page.

Privacy law1 instrument, 1 in force

Research summary (140 words)

Libya has no comprehensive data-protection statute or dedicated data-protection supervisory authority; its personal-data rules sit in Chapter Seven of Law No. 6 of 2022 Concerning Electronic Transactions, issued by the House of Representatives and in force since 4 October 2022.

That chapter binds a public entity or authentication service provider that collects personal data in connection with issuing, maintaining, or facilitating an electronic authentication certificate, and, more broadly, any person who controls personal data by virtue of their work in electronic transactions.

The chapter's criminal counterpart, article 81, states penalties for the offences article 80 lists, which are forging or misusing an electronic signature, record, or authentication certificate rather than the personal-data restrictions article 79 states, so the text does not clearly arm a separate criminal penalty or private right of action for a breach of the personal-data duties themselves.

Comprehensive regime

Law No. 6 of 2022, protection of personal data collected in electronic transactions

Law No. 6 of 2022 Concerning Electronic Transactions, arts. 73-79 (Protection of Personal Data)English translation from The Law Society of Libya (Almajma Legal Directory) legislation database

In force since 4 October 2022. Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 73 of Law No. 6 of 2022 requires a public entity or an authentication service provider to obtain a person's explicit consent before collecting their personal data, and confines any collection to the purpose of issuing, maintaining, or facilitating a certificate, absent the person's further explicit consent to a different purpose.

Article 74 lists narrow grounds on which collecting, disclosing, or processing personal data is otherwise lawful, including a criminal investigation, a court order, a tax assessment, or protecting a person's vital interest.

Article 75 binds the authentication service provider to keep personal data confidential and bars disclosing, transferring, or publishing it without the data subject's prior consent, and article 76 requires any person who controls personal data by virtue of their work in electronic transactions to give the data subject notice, before processing, of who is responsible for the processing and the nature, purpose, and method of the processing.

Article 77 requires the authentication service provider to let the person whose data was collected access and update it, including all personal data sites related to them, through appropriate technological means. Article 78 requires due consideration of the nature of the data, its source, the purpose and duration of processing, and the destination country's laws and security measures before personal data is transferred outside Libya.

Article 79 bars sending electronic documents to a person who has explicitly refused them, bars processing personal data against the data subject's explicit refusal, and bars using personal data for a purpose other than the one agreed to without the data subject's consent; article 81's criminal penalties are stated for the offences article 80 lists, and the text does not clearly extend that penalty to article 79's restrictions on personal-data processing.

What it requires

Scraping law2 instruments, 2 in force

Research summary (142 words)

Libya's computer-misuse framework is Law No. 5 of 2022 Concerning Combating Cybercrimes, issued by the House of Representatives and in force since its issuance on 27 September 2022. Unauthorized access to a computer system, information network, or website is an offence only where its protection measures are intentionally breached, so a public, unauthenticated page carrying no such measure falls outside the offence.

No statute or reported case addresses terms-of-service enforceability or the effect of login or acceptance of terms, and robots.txt carries no statutory weight one way or the other.

Law No. 9 of 1968 Issuing the Copyright Protection Law denies separate copyright protection to a collection or anthology of works as such, protecting only the individual works it contains, so Libya has no sui generis database right; the law predates the internet and states no text-and-data-mining exception or machine-readable opt-out mechanism.

Computer misuse

Law No. 5 of 2022 on Combating Cybercrimes, unauthorised access and system interference

Law No. 5 of 2022 Concerning Combating Cybercrimes, arts. 10-16English translation of Law No. 5 of 2022 from The Law Society of Libya (Almajma Legal Directory) legislation database

In force since 27 September 2022. Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 11 of Law No. 5 of 2022 makes accessing a computer system, information system, information network, or website unlawful only where its protection measures are intentionally breached, wholly or partially, without authorization or in violation of an authorization.

Article 12 punishes unauthorized access with up to one year's imprisonment or a fine of 100 to 500 Libyan dinars, rising to at least one year and 500 to 5,000 dinars where the access deletes, alters, discloses, or copies data or disables or defaces a system, and to imprisonment and a fine of no less than 10,000 dinars where the access disables an information system or disrupts a network's operation.

Article 10 separately prohibits influencing an electronic system, network, or record by obtaining, disclosing, transmitting, or publishing a password, code, or other confidential data with intent to gain an unauthorized benefit or harm another.

Article 13 punishes intercepting an information system to obtain digital data with at least one year's imprisonment and a fine of 1,000 to 5,000 dinars, and article 14 punishes possessing or distributing a device or program prepared to reveal passwords or access codes or to break protection measures with at least one year's imprisonment and a fine of 1,000 to 10,000 dinars.

What it requires

News aggregation law1 instrument, 1 in force

Research summary (161 words)

Libya has no press-publisher neighbouring right and no compelled platform-to-publisher bargaining regime.

Law No. 9 of 1968 Issuing the Copyright Protection Law permits a quotation or short extract from a published work where it is intended for criticism, discussion, education, or information and names the author and source, and lets a newspaper or periodical publish a quotation, summary, or short statement from another's work without the author's permission, or copy an article on political, economic, scientific, or religious discussion of public interest, unless the source publication has indicated that copying is prohibited.

The same law states that its protection does not extend to daily events and other occurrences having the nature of ordinary news, so a news fact carries no copyright claim in the first place rather than surviving one under a separate misappropriation doctrine. No statute or reported case addresses hyperlinking or framing, and no text-and-data-mining exception or machine-readable opt-out mechanism is in force; the 1968 law predates the concept.

This page covers the instruments LexLint has researched to a stage. Instruments named in the corpus but not yet researched are counted in the head and are not listed here. Every entry carries its own primary source on its note page. This is a research index, not legal advice.