Law / Marshall Islands

Marshall Islands

2 of 4 named instruments researched to a stage, across one of the six areas of law we track: 2 in force. As of 7 September 2026.

  1. AI law none researched
  2. Privacy law 2
  3. Scraping law none researched
  4. Cybersecurity law none researched
  5. Age gating law none researched
  6. News aggregation law none researched

in forceenacted but not yet in forceproposedrepealed, withdrawn or blocked

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page.

Privacy law2 instruments, 2 in force

Research summary (231 words)

The Marshall Islands enacted its first personal-data statute, the Personal Data Protection Act 2025 (6 MIRC Ch. 4), which commenced on 7 October 2025 and applies to core Government ministries and agencies that collect, use, store, process, disclose, or transfer the personal data of natural persons, including a third party acting as a data controller or data processor on such a ministry's or agency's behalf; it excludes law-enforcement and national-security processing, non-personal data, and publicly available information, and gives a person residing in the Republic a right to sue a ministry or agency for improper administration, though a court may not award compensatory damages against the ministry or agency itself.

No statute extends a comparable duty to a private-sector controller or processor acting outside a government engagement.

Section 250.12 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of the Marshall Islands 2011 (31 MIRC Ch. 1) separately makes it a misdemeanour for any person to trespass with intent to eavesdrop or surveil, to install a device to observe or record in a private place without consent, or to intercept a private telephone, facsimile, electronic-mail, or letter communication without the sender's or receiver's consent, which is the Republic's closest general privacy protection reaching private parties.

Article II of the Constitution of the Republic of the Marshall Islands protects personal autonomy and privacy against government intrusion but states no operative duty of its own.

Comprehensive regime

Criminal Code 2011, Violation of Privacy (unlawful eavesdropping, surveillance, and breach of privacy of messages)

Criminal Code 2011, 31 MIRC Ch. 1, sec. 250.12Marshall Islands Revised Code, 31 MIRC Ch. 1 (Criminal Code of the Republic of the Marshall Islands 2011), archived consolidated text

archived copyRead from a public archive copy, not the publisher directly. The publisher does not serve this page to automated readers, so a direct fetch was not an option here; how we access sources. Archived 2020. Publisher's page: https://www.paclii.org/mh/legis/consol_act/cc201194/

In force since 17 October 2011. Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Section 250.12(1) makes it a misdemeanour, except as authorized by law, to trespass on property with intent to subject anyone to eavesdropping or other surveillance in a private place, to install in a private place, without the consent of the person entitled to privacy there, a device for observing, photographing, recording, amplifying, or broadcasting sounds or events, or to install or use outside a private place a device for hearing, recording, amplifying, or broadcasting sounds originating in that place that would not ordinarily be audible or comprehensible outside, again without that person's consent.

Section 250.12(2) separately makes it a misdemeanour to knowingly intercept, without the consent of the sender or receiver, a message by telephone, telegraph, facsimile, electronic mail, letter, or other means of communicating privately, an offence that does not extend to overhearing a message through a regularly installed telephone party line or extension, or to an interception by the telephone company or a subscriber incident to enforcing regulations that limit use of the facilities.

The section states no penalty of its own; a misdemeanour under the Code's general sentencing provisions carries a fine of up to $1,000 and a definite term of imprisonment, fixed by the court, of up to one year.

What it requires

Personal Data Protection Act 2025, government personal-data protection regime

Personal Data Protection Act 2025, 6 MIRC Ch. 4 (P.L. 2025-43)Marshall Islands Revised Code, 6 MIRC Ch. 4 (Personal Data Protection Act 2025), archived capture of the certified text

archived copyRead from a public archive copy, not the publisher directly. The publisher does not serve this page to automated readers, so a direct fetch was not an option here; how we access sources. Archived 2026. Publisher's page: https://www.rmiparliament.org/cms/images/LEGISLATION/PRINCIPAL/2025/2025-0043/2025-0043_1.pdf

In force 11 months, effective 7 October 2025. Binds government bodies.

What this law does

The Act applies to core Government ministries and agencies of the Republic that collect, use, store, process, disclose, or transfer personal data of natural persons, and its definitions of data controller and data processor extend to a third party acting on behalf of such a ministry or agency, but it excludes processing for law enforcement or national intelligence and national security purposes, non-personal data, and publicly available information lawfully obtained from government records, voluntarily made available by the data subject without audience restriction, or otherwise lawfully obtained, truthful, and a matter of public concern.

It sets six personal data protection principles binding core Government ministries and agencies: a legitimate-purpose principle requiring lawful, fair, transparent processing for specified purposes; a data-minimization principle; an accuracy principle; a retention principle limiting storage to what the purpose requires; an integrity and security principle requiring appropriate technical and organizational protection and access limitation; and an accountability principle making the data controller responsible for demonstrating compliance.

The Economic Policy, Planning and Statistics Office is designated the competent authority, empowered to issue guidance, coordinate data sharing among ministries, and make implementing rules.

A natural person residing in the Republic who suffers an injury from a core Government ministry's or agency's alleged improper administration of the Act may bring suit for an injunction, mandamus, a corrective order, or a public statement of remedy, but a court may not award compensatory damages against the ministry or agency itself, though a person may separately sue an employee personally for wilful or grossly negligent conduct.

The Act states no penalty or offence provision, and section 417 lets the competent authority make further regulations, with Cabinet approval, for the Chapter's effective performance.

What it requires

This page covers the instruments LexLint has researched to a stage. Instruments named in the corpus but not yet researched are counted in the head and are not listed here. Every entry carries its own primary source on its note page. This is a research index, not legal advice.