Law / Tunisia

Tunisia

3 of 5 named instruments researched to a stage, across three of the six areas of law we track: 3 in force. As of 5 September 2026.

  1. AI law none researched
  2. Privacy law 1
  3. Scraping law 1
  4. Cybersecurity law none researched
  5. Age gating law none researched
  6. News aggregation law 1

in forceenacted but not yet in forceproposedrepealed, withdrawn or blocked

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page.

Privacy law1 instrument, 1 in force

Research summary (156 words)

Tunisia's comprehensive personal-data regime is Loi organique n° 2004-63 du 27 juillet 2004, portant sur la protection des données à caractère personnel, enforced by the Instance Nationale de Protection des Données à Caractère Personnel (INPDP).

The Act binds any natural or legal person carrying out automated or non-automated processing of personal data, requires a prior declaration to or authorization from the INPDP before processing, express written consent and advance notice before collection, and the INPDP's prior authorization for any transfer of personal data outside Tunisia.

It defines personal data broadly but excludes information tied to a person's public life from that definition, and it subjects data revealing racial or genetic origin, religious, political, philosophical or trade-union views, or health to a heightened, generally consent-based restriction. An organic bill to replace the 2004 Act, filed by 17 members of the Assembly of the Representatives of the People in July-August 2025, remains pending and has not been adopted.

Comprehensive regime

Organic Act on the Protection of Personal Data

Loi organique n° 2004-63 du 27 juillet 2004, portant sur la protection des données à caractère personnelFull French text of Loi organique n° 2004-63

In force since 30 July 2004. Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article premier declares the protection of personal data a fundamental, constitutionally guaranteed right, and article 2 applies the Act to both automated and non-automated processing carried out by a natural or legal person, with article 3 exempting processing for a strictly personal or family purpose not communicated to a third party.

Article 7 requires a prior declaration to the INPDP before any processing, deemed accepted if the INPDP does not object within one month, and article 8 requires the INPDP's prior authorization for the processing listed elsewhere in the Act.

Article 14 prohibits processing data revealing racial or genetic origin, religious, political, philosophical or trade-union views, or health, unless the person gives express consent in a form leaving a written trace, the data has become manifestly public, or the processing is necessary for historical or scientific purposes or to safeguard the person's vital interests, with article 15 requiring the INPDP's separate authorization for that processing (except health data).

Article 27 requires the person's express, written consent before processing, and article 31 requires advance written notice of the processing's purpose, its recipients, the person's access and objection rights, the retention period, and the destination country of any transfer.

Articles 32 to 43 give the data subject a right of access, rectification, and objection, enforceable before the INPDP, and articles 51 and 52 require the INPDP's prior authorization before any transfer of personal data abroad, conditioned on the destination country assuring an adequate level of protection. Article 50 separately bars any transfer of personal data abroad capable of harming public security or Tunisia's vital interests, regardless of that authorization. Article 20 makes the data controller and processor civilly liable for a breach of the Act's provisions.

What it requires

Scraping law1 instrument, 1 in force

Research summary (237 words)

Tunisia has no scraping-specific statute, so general law governs each dimension separately.

Décret-loi n° 2022-54 du 13 septembre 2022 criminalises knowingly accessing or remaining in a computer system without authorization, or exceeding the limits of a granted access right, but does not by its terms reach reading a public, unauthenticated page that defeats no access control, and no reported case has tested the point; the same decree-loi separately criminalises using an information system to access copyright-protected content without the rightholder's authorization for profit (art. 25), a distinct offence from unauthorized computer access.

No Tunisian court has ruled on the enforceability of a browsewrap or clickwrap terms-of-service against a scraper. Loi n° 94-36 du 24 février 1994 relative à la propriété littéraire et artistique excludes the news of the day and mere facts from copyright protection and permits quotations and press-review borrowings from a lawfully disclosed work, but Tunisia has not enacted a text-and-data-mining exception, and the Law confers no sui generis database right.

Loi organique n° 2004-63 du 27 juillet 2004 applies to personal data without a general carve-out for publicly accessible information beyond information tied to a person's public life, so scraping personal data from a public Tunisian website remains subject to that Act's consent, notice and cross-border-transfer duties.

No Tunisian statute or reported decision establishes a scraping-specific unfair-competition or misappropriation doctrine, and none assigns legal weight to a robots.txt directive or imposes an AI-training-specific rule.

Computer misuse

Decree-Law on Cybercrime, unauthorised access

Décret-loi n° 2022-54 du 13 septembre 2022 relatif à la lutte contre les infractions se rapportant aux systèmes d'information et de communication, art. 16Full French and Arabic text of Décret-loi n° 2022-54

In force since 16 September 2022. Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 16 punishes anyone who knowingly accesses or remains illegally in a computer system, in whole or in part, and imposes the same penalty on anyone who knowingly exceeds the limits of an access right they have been granted; an attempt is also punishable. The offence carries three months to one year of imprisonment and a fine of 10,000 dinars.

Because the offence's trigger is illegal access or exceeding a granted access right, reading a public, unauthenticated page that defeats no access control falls outside a plain reading of the provision. Article 37 repeals the former articles 199 bis and 199 ter of the Penal Code, which the decree-loi's Chapter III offences supersede.

What it requires

News aggregation law1 instrument, 1 in force

Research summary (199 words)

Tunisia has no press-publisher neighbouring right, no mandatory platform-to-publisher bargaining code, no recognized hot-news misappropriation doctrine distinct from ordinary copyright law, and no located statute or case law addressing hyperlinking or framing liability specifically; each of those dimensions is a sourced absence rather than an unresolved question.

The relevant instrument is Loi n° 94-36 du 24 février 1994 relative à la propriété littéraire et artistique, which excludes the news of the day and mere facts of a press-information character from copyright protection outright, so a bare fact or news item is never protectable regardless of who first reported it.

The same Law lets a person make quotations and borrowings from a lawfully disclosed work, including quotations and borrowings from articles in the form of press reviews, provided they conform to fair practice and are justified by a scientific, educational or informational purpose, with the source and author named; nothing limits that exception to short extracts by a length threshold, and no located Tunisian decision applies it to a systematic news aggregator as opposed to a traditional press review.

The Law predates the concept of a machine-readable text-and-data-mining reservation and confers no sui generis database right, so neither exists here.

Snippet reproduction

Copyright Act, Facts Exclusion and Quotation and Press-Review Exception

Loi n° 94-36 du 24 février 1994 relative à la propriété littéraire et artistique, telle que modifiée et complétée par la loi n° 2009-33 du 23 juin 2009, arts. 1er et 11Loi n° 94-36, French consolidated text as amended to 2009, reproduced on the WIPO Lex record page for the Law

In force since 1 March 1994. Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article premier extends copyright to every original literary, scientific or artistic work but states that protection covers expressions and does not extend to official legislative, administrative or judicial texts and their official translations, or to the news of the day or miscellaneous facts that have the character of simple press information; a bare fact or news item is therefore never a protected work under Tunisian law, whichever outlet reports it first.

Article 11 separately authorises quotations and borrowings taken from a work already lawfully made accessible to the public, including quotations and borrowings from articles in the form of press reviews, on condition that they conform to fair practice and are justified by a scientific, educational or informational purpose, used in their original version or in translation, and accompanied by mention of the source and the author's name where it appears in the source.

The exception is not capped at a headline-length or short-extract threshold and is not confined to the press industry; whether it reaches a systematic aggregator's reproduction of headlines and snippets, as opposed to a traditional press review, has not been tested in a located Tunisian decision.

Article 51 arms a rightholder with civil damages for a breach of copyright or related rights, and article 52 sets a criminal fine of 1,000 to 50,000 dinars, doubled on repeat offence with up to twelve months' imprisonment added, for exploiting a protected work without the required authorization.

Note and primary source

This page covers the instruments LexLint has researched to a stage. Instruments named in the corpus but not yet researched are counted in the head and are not listed here. Every entry carries its own primary source on its note page. This is a research index, not legal advice.