Law / Tuvalu

Tuvalu

2 of 5 named instruments researched to a stage, across one of the six areas of law we track: 2 in force. As of 7 September 2026.

  1. AI law none researched
  2. Privacy law none researched
  3. Scraping law 2
  4. Cybersecurity law none researched
  5. Age gating law none researched
  6. News aggregation law none researched

in forceenacted but not yet in forceproposedrepealed, withdrawn or blocked

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page.

Scraping law2 instruments, 2 in force

Research summary (178 words)

Tuvalu has no scraping-specific statute and no dedicated computer-misuse law: the Penal Code (1965) predates computers and contains no unauthorised-access, hacking, or cybercrime provision, and a draft Cybersecurity Bill had not been tabled in Parliament.

The closest analogue is the Tuvalu Telecommunications Corporation Act 1993, which criminalises intentionally intercepting, disclosing, or interfering with a message carried on the state telecommunications system and operating a competing telecommunications service without authorisation; its offences are aimed at the state telecommunications monopoly rather than at unauthorised computer access generally, and no reported case has applied it to web crawling.

No Tuvaluan court has ruled on the enforceability of a browsewrap or clickwrap terms-of-service against a scraper. The Copyright Ordinance (Chapter 40.24, Revised Edition 2008) sets local infringement penalties and incorporates the United Kingdom Copyright Act 1956's importation-restriction provision, but its own text carries no text-and-data-mining exception, and Tuvalu's copyright statute confers no sui generis database right.

No statute or reported case establishes a scraping-specific unfair-competition or misappropriation doctrine, and none assigns legal weight to a robots.txt directive or imposes an AI-training-specific rule.

Computer misuse

Tuvalu Telecommunications Corporation Act 1993, offences and penalties

Tuvalu Telecommunications Corporation Act 1993 (Act No. 4 of 1993), s. 33 (offences and penalties)Tuvalu Telecommunications Corporation Act 1993 (Act No. 4 of 1993)

archived copyRead from a public archive copy, not the publisher directly. The publisher does not serve this page to automated readers, so a direct fetch was not an option here; how we access sources. Archived January 1, 2024. Publisher's page: http://www.paclii.org/tv/legis/num_act/ttca1993438/

In force since 1 February 1994. Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Section 33 makes it an offence for any person to, among other things, dishonestly obtain a telecommunication service to avoid payment; send a message that is grossly offensive, indecent, obscene, or menacing, or a message known to be false and sent to cause annoyance, inconvenience, or needless anxiety; intentionally modify, intercept, or disclose the content of a message; damage, remove, or interfere with telecommunication apparatus or a telecommunication line; or assist the working of an unlicensed telecommunication system, or otherwise contravene the Corporation's sole and exclusive right under section 6 to supply telecommunication services in Tuvalu.

Section 34 lets the convicting court additionally order the offender to pay compensation for any damage done. Section 35 repeals the earlier Telecommunications Ordinance (Chapter 100), under which the same conduct was addressed in narrower terms.

What it requires

This page covers the instruments LexLint has researched to a stage. Instruments named in the corpus but not yet researched are counted in the head and are not listed here. Every entry carries its own primary source on its note page. This is a research index, not legal advice.