age
Oregon has no adult content age verification law. A bill that would have required age verification for websites where a substantial share of content is sexual material harmful to minors (HB 2032) died when the 2025 session adjourned on June 27, 2025, and an app store age verification bill (HB 3696) died in House committee at the same adjournment; the short 2026 session, which adjourned March 6, 2026, enacted nothing in the four tracked families.
Oregon has no social media specific minor access law. Its age gating protection instead runs through its comprehensive privacy law: a 2025 amendment to the Oregon Consumer Privacy Act (HB 2008) bars selling the personal data of, serving targeted advertising to, or profiling a consumer the controller knows or willfully disregards is under 16, in effect since January 1, 2026.
privacy
The Oregon Consumer Privacy Act (OCPA), ORS 646A.570 to 646A.589, is Oregon's comprehensive consumer-privacy regime, enacted as S.B. 619 (2023), effective July 1, 2024 for most controllers, with nonprofits exempt until January 1, 2026. Every citation in this document is re-sourced to the official Oregon State Legislature site (oregonlegislature.gov); the earlier draft cited oregon.public.law throughout, a private republisher, which fails source-quality rule 1.
'Oregon Consumer Privacy Act' is the popular name for S.B. 619; the codified sections carry no short-title or caption naming the Act, so privacy_regime is recorded here as free text and left unpinned rather than pinned to text that does not exist. Two 2025 amendments (H.B. 2008, H.B. 3875), effective January 1, 2026, added a precise-geolocation sale ban, a strict under-16 processing prohibition, and removed motor-vehicle manufacturers from the small-controller exemption.
Genetic or biometric data is one of OCPA's enumerated sensitive-data categories, unqualified by an identification-purpose clause, confirming the carried seed's sensitive_biometric_restriction value of True on that separate question.
Oregon's biometric-data definition also carries the most explicit clawback in this batch: it separately and by name brings facial mapping or facial geometry back into 'biometric data' whenever generated or used to identify a specific consumer, in addition to the general photo, audio, or video-derived-data clawback. A separate chapter, ORS 646A.604, governs breach notification, requiring notice to the Attorney General only once the number of affected consumers exceeds 250.
The Attorney General has exclusive enforcement authority, with a discretionary cure option from the outset of the Act; there is no private right of action.