Personal Data Protection Law, supervisory authority and sanctions
Loi n°001-2021/AN, arts. 45-79 (autorité de contrôle et sanctions)
A citation is an address, not a summary. The first part names the law; what follows narrows it to the exact section, article or paragraph.
What follows is LexLint's own research summary of this law, not legal advice.
In force since 30 March 2021.
An enforcement supervision rule binding public and private bodies.
As of 19 September 2026.
What it requires
- Expect the Commission de l'informatique et des libertés (CIL), an independent administrative authority of nine members, to issue individual or regulatory decisions, warnings and referrals to the public prosecutor, and to receive complaints and petitions from data subjects.
- Cooperate with a CIL verification or control mission on site, including any expert it brings, and pay the mission's costs yourself if you were the one who requested the control.
- Take all useful measures to facilitate the CIL's mission, and do not obstruct its action for any reason.
- Expect a data subject or their representative to be able to seek urgent court relief for a serious and immediate violation of their rights, and to seek damages for the moral or material harm they suffered.
- Expect the CIL to pronounce a forfeitary fine of one percent of your prior year's tax-exclusive turnover for a first violation, rising to five percent for a repeat violation, on top of the fixed-range fines, confiscation, publication or activity-ban penalties it may add, and expect a violation of this law to be punished under the Penal Code's information-technology offense provisions.
If you get it wrong
Criminal exposureYes
Private right of actionYes
Criminal exposure note
Article 79 refers violations of this law to the Penal Code's own provisions on information-technology and communications-technology offenses, rather than stating a criminal amount in this law itself. Article 75 separately sets a reduced administrative fine of two million to five million francs CFA for an unauthorized disclosure of personal data caused by imprudence or negligence, the law's only breach-adjacent provision.
Penalty structure
Art. 65 sets the CIL's general forfeitary fine (l'amende forfaitaire) at 1% of the controller's prior-year, tax-exclusive turnover for a first violation, rising to 5% for a repeat violation, proportioned to the gravity of the breach and the advantage gained from it. The same Title IV, Chapter 1 also lists a separate schedule of fixed-range fines the CIL may pronounce for specific enumerated violations (Arts. 67 to 75), running from 1,000,000 to 100,000,000 CFA francs depending on the violation (for example, 5,000,000 to 100,000,000 francs for diverting the purpose of a collection, and 2,000,000 to 5,000,000 francs for an unauthorized disclosure caused by imprudence or negligence); the law's own text does not state how that fixed-range schedule relates to the Art. 65 percentage formula.
- Rule
- Turnover pct only
- As of
- 19 September 2026
- Turnover percentage cap
- 5
Who enforces it
Enforcement body
Commission de l'informatique et des libertés (CIL), an independent administrative authority of nine members created by the law
What it reaches
Obligation class
Governance, Reporting
What this law does
Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page.
Article 45 creates the Commission de l'informatique et des libertés (CIL) as an independent administrative authority with administrative and management autonomy, charged with policing the use of information and communication technologies in personal data processing.
Article 46 sets the CIL's composition at nine members drawn from the Conseil d'Etat, the Cour de Cassation, the National Assembly, human-rights associations, information-technology professional associations, and the President of Faso.
Articles 47 to 55 fix the members' five-year renewable mandate, their irremovability except on listed grounds, the President's status and permanent duties, incompatibilities with government office or a technology-industry role, an oath before the Ouagadougou Court of Appeal, their functional immunity, and the CIL's budget and financing rules, including a bar on borrowed funds.
Article 56 lists the CIL's attributions, including issuing individual and regulatory decisions and sector recommendations, ordering exceptional security measures, warning offenders and referring infractions to the public prosecutor, receiving complaints and petitions, authorizing foreign transfers, and advising public authorities and the government.
Article 57 lets the CIL send members, agents or experts to verify and control any processing on site, and Article 58 bars anyone the CIL is investigating from obstructing its action. Article 61 requires the CIL to submit an annual public report on its mission to the President of Faso and the President of the National Assembly.
Article 63 lists the CIL's administrative sanctions: a warning, a formal notice, an order to stop the processing, the locking of certain data, a forfeitary fine, and withdrawal of authorization. Article 65 sets that forfeitary fine at one percent of the controller's tax-exclusive turnover for the last closed financial year on a first violation, rising to five percent on a repeat violation, proportioned to the gravity of the breach and the advantage gained from it.
Article 66 lets the CIL's president or a person whose rights are violated seek urgent court relief for a serious and immediate violation, and lets a data subject or their representative seek damages for the moral or material harm suffered.
Articles 67 to 75 set a schedule of fixed-range fines for specific violations, running from one million to one hundred million francs CFA depending on the violation, including a reduced fine for an unauthorized disclosure caused by imprudence or negligence, though the act's own text does not state how this fixed-range schedule relates to the Article 65 percentage formula.
Article 76 lets the CIL confiscate or order the erasure of the data's physical media and bar a sanctioned controller from managing any processing for up to two years, and Article 77 lets it order publication of its decision at the offender's expense. Article 79 refers violations of the act to the Penal Code's own provisions on information-technology and communications-technology offenses.
When LexLint raises it
crawls_webtrains_modelsdeploys_chatbothigh_risk_decisionsis_listed_company
Read the law
Every line above is drawn from the primary source linked here, read on the date shown. This is a research summary, not legal advice.